中山管理評論

  期刊全文閱覽

中山管理評論  2022/12

第30卷第5期  p.767-807

DOI:10.6160/SYSMR.202212_30(5).0001


題目
意會重塑:博物館服務設計中的導意作法
Sense Reframing: Sensegiving within a Museum’s Service Design
(159_M63a54d256de0c_Full.pdf 1,073KB)

作者
徐嘉黛/國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所
Chia-Tai Hsu/

Graduate Institute of Technology Innovation & Intellectual Property Management, National Cheng-Chi University


摘要(中文)

企業不僅要擔心服務創新沒被採納,更擔心被曲解的採用。此時,理解創新的認知過程成為關鍵。本研究調查博物館的導覽服務,分析設計者如何引導意會促成對認知的重塑。本文從設計者與使用者的互動過程,闡釋意會的三階段:始意會、導意會、再意會,以理解創新歷程中認知的變化。學理上,本文提出導意新作法,點出意會理論中認知轉換的重要性,追溯導意重塑認知框架的作法,探討意會的連貫性、互動性與可塑性。實務上,本文解釋導意應用於展商複合的思維及服務設計的微旅程。這類新導覽方式使博物館策展不再侷限於不動、走動與互動,而能產生文化上的感動。當設計者理解意會過程,就能引導驚訝變成驚喜,使意會變為心領神會,服務創新得以歷久彌新。

(159_M63a54d256de0c_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(中文)

意會、導意、認知轉移、意會重塑、服務設計


摘要(英文)

What enterprises should worry is not about the none-adoption of service innovation, but adoptions that are used inaccurately. Users often make false senses during unfamiliar situations, which leads to undesirable outcomes. In this circumstance, understanding the cognitive dynamics underpinning the innovation process becomes critical. This research investigates the service design of a museum’s guided tours and analyzes how designers redirect audiences’ sensemaking, while facilitating cognitive reframing of artifacts. This article examines the interaction between designers and users, elaborating the three phases of sensemaking: initial sensemaking, sensegiving and sense-remaking, in order to apprehend the process of cognitive shift. Theoretically, this article proposes new practices of sensegiving, assisting audiences to establish new sensemaking from their initial misinterpretation towards artifacts. Such analysis also points out the pivotal role of cognitive shift in sensemaking theories, tracing how designers’ sensegiving may reframe users’ cognition. Practically, this paper explains the use of sensegiving in building hybrid business model, and exploring the micro-journey in service design. As such, museum curating no more needs to be constrained in the traditional models of the static display, packaged tours and digital interaction, while allowing exhibitions to induce cultural inspiration. When designers could recognize the triggering process of sensemaking, it would be possible to turn startle into surprise, and sensemaking into appreciation. In so doing, service innovation would become more sustainable.

(159_M63a54d256de0c_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(英文)

Sensemaking, Sensegiving, Cognitive Shift, Sense Reframing, Service Design


政策與管理意涵


參考文獻

李宜曄、林詠能,2008,「十三行博物館導覽服務滿意度與重遊意願研究」,博物館學季刊,22卷1期:93~105。(Lee, I. Y. and Lin, Y. N., 2008, “Study on the Satisfaction of Exhibition Guide Service and Willingness to Revisit among Museum Visitors: An Example of the Shihsanhang Museum,” Museology Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1, 93-105.)
林玟伶,2010,「補助、不補助?博物館補助的辯論與審思」,博物館學季刊,24卷3期:47~61。(Lin, W. L., 2010, “To Subsidize or Not to Subsidize? Reflections and Debates on the Issue of Museum Subsidies,” Museology Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 3, 47-61.)
耿鳳英,2011,「誰的故事?-論博物館展示詮釋」,博物館學季刊,25卷3期:
99~ 111。(Ken, F. Y., 2011, “Whose Story? An Investigation of Exhibition Interpretation,” Museology Quarterly, Vol.25, No. 3, 99-111.)
耿鳳英,2017,「突破與創新—論國家博物館展示的新視野」,博物館學季刊,31卷3期:79~98。(Ken, F. Y., 2017, “Breakthrough and Innovation: New Visions for National Museum Exhibitions,” Museology Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 3, 79-98.)
張婉真,2016,「 策展非物質-兩個機構史展覽的比較研究」,博物館學季刊,30卷4期:55~71。(Chang, W. C., 2016, “Curating the Immaterial: A Comparative Study of Two Institutional History Exhibitions,” Museology Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4, 55-71.)
鄭淑文、許家瑋、林詠能,2018,「數位時代下的博物館觀眾經驗」,博物館與文化,15期:31~51。(Cheng, S. W., Hsu, C. W., and Lin, Y. N., 2018, “Museum Visitor Experience in the Digital Era,” Journal of Museum and Culture, No. 15, 31-51.)
蕭瑞麟、徐嘉黛,2020,「境隨心轉:服務隨創中的認知轉移與資源轉換」,組織與管理,13卷2期:1~51。(Hsiao, R. L. and Hsu, C. T., 2020, “On Second Thought: Cognitive Shift and Resource Conversion within Service Bricolage,” Journal of Organization and Management, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1-51.)
Agar, M., 1980, The professional stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography, 1st , New York: Academic Press.
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G., 2005, “From Intended Strategies to Unintended Outcomes: The Impact of Change Recipient Sensemaking,” Organization Studies, Vol. 26, No. 11, 1573-1601.
Bilgili, H., Tochman, C. J., Ellstrand, A. E., and Johnson, J. L., 2017, “Riding off into the Sunset: Organizational Sensegiving, Shareholder Sensemaking, and Reactions to CEO Retirement,” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 54, No. 7, 1019-1049.
Bishop, D. G., Treviño, L. K., Gioia, D. A., and Kreiner, G. E., 2020, “Leveraging a Recessive Narrative to Transform Joe Paterno’s Image: Media Sensebreaking, Sensemaking, and Sensegiving During Scandal,” Academy of Management Discoveries, Vol. 6, No. 4, 572-608.
Camarero, C. and Garrido, M. J., 2012, “Fostering Innovation in Cultural Contexts: Market Orientation, Service Orientation, and Innovations in Museums,” Journal of Service Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, 39-58.
Christianson, M. K., 2019, “More and Less Effective Updating: The Role of Trajectory Management in Making Sense Again,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 64, No. 1, 45-86.
Collins, D., 2013, “In Search of Popular Management: Sensemaking, Sensegiving and Storytelling in the Excellence Project,” Culture & Organization, Vol. 19, No. 1, 42-61.
Coombs, R., Knights, D., and Willmott, H. C., 1992, “Culture, Control and Competition; Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Information Technology in Organizations,” Organization Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1, 51-73.
Creed, W. E. D., Dejordy, R., and Lok, J., 2010, “Being the Change: Resolving Institutional Contradiction through Identity Work,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.53, No. 6, 1336-1364.
Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O'Neill, R. M., Hayes, E., and Wierba, E., 1997, “Reading the Wind: How Middle Managers Assess the Context for Selling Issues to Top Managers,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 5, 407-725.
Falk, J. H. and Dierking, L. D., 1992, The Museum Experience, 1st, Washington: Howells House.
Foldy, E. G., Goldman, L., and Ospina, S., 2008, “Sensegiving and the Role of Cognitive Shifts in the Work of Leadership,” Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 5, 514-529.
Gioia, D. and Chittipeddi, K., 1991, “Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 6, 433-448.
Gioia, D. A., Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., and Chittipeddi, K., 1994, “Symbolism and Strategic Change in Academia: The Dynamics of Sensemaking and Influence,” Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 3, 363-383.
Goffman, E., 1974, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Cambridge, 1st, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Griffith, T., 1999, “Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, 472-488.
Kent, T., 2010, “The Role of the Museum Shop in Extending the Visitor Experience,” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 1, 67-77.
Komarac, T., Ozretic-Dosen, D., and Skare, V., 2019, “The Role of the Museum Shop: Eliciting the Opinions of Museum Professionals,” International Journal of Arts Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, 28-41.
Logemann, M., Piekkari, R., and Cornelissen, J., 2019, “The Sense of It All: Framing and Narratives in Sensegiving About a Strategic Change,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 52, No. 5.
Maitlis, S., 2005, “The Social Processes of Organizational Sensemaking,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, 21-49.
Miles, R. S., 1988, The Design of Educational Exhibits, 2nd, London: Routledge.
Orlikowski, W. J. and Gash, D. C., 1994, “Technology Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 2, 174-207.
Pettigrew, A. M., 1987, “Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm,” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 24, No. 6, 649-670.
Prasad, P., 1993, “Symbolic Processes in the Implementation of Technological Change: A Symbolic Interactionist Study of Work Computerization,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 6, 1400-1429.
Reinecke, J. and Ansari, S., 2021, “Microfoundations of Framing: The Interactional Production of Collective Action Frames in the Occupy Movement,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 64, No. 2, 378-408.
Robert, K. and Ola, L., 2021, “Reflexive Sensegiving: An Open-ended Process of Influencing the Sensemaking of Others During Organizational Change,” European Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, 476-486.
Rouleau, L., 2005, “Micro-Practices of Strategic Sensemaking and Sensegiving: How Middle Managers Interpret and Sell Change Every Day,” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 42, No. 7, 1413-1441.
Schildt, H., Mantere, S., and Cornelissen, J., 2019,“ Power in Sensemaking Processes,” Organization Studies, Vol. 41, No. 2, 1-25.
Weick, K. E., 1993, “ The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 4, 628-652.
Weick, K. E., 1995, Sensemaking in Organization, 1st, London: Sage.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., and Obstfeld, D., 2005, “Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking,” Organization Science, Vol. 16, No. 4, 409-425.
Whittington, R., 2006, “Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research,” Organization Studies, Vol. 27, No. 5, 613-634.
Yin, R. K., 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 1st, Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Zilber, T. B., 2006, “The Work of the Symbolic in Institutional Processes: Translations of Rational Myths in Israeli High-Tech,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, No. 2, 281-303.