中山管理評論

  期刊全文閱覽

中山管理評論  2020/9

第28卷第3期  p.469-506

DOI:10.6160/SYSMR.202003_28(3).0003


題目
繼任會計師事務所初次查核審計公費降低對投資人在盈餘品質認知之影響
Effects of Discounting Initial Audit Fees Paid to Succeeding Audit Firms on Investors’ Perceptions to Earnings Quality
(148_M5f69a082b157b_Full.pdf 2,123KB)

作者
方俊儒、盧正壽/國立彰化師範大學會計學系、國立高雄科技大學財政稅務系
Chun-Ju Fang, Cheng-Shou Lu/

Department of Accounting, National Changhua University of Education; Department of Public Finance and Taxation, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology


摘要(中文)

國內自2002年起規定證券發行公司在更換會計師事務所之後,若繼任之會計師事務所收取之審計公費降低,必須揭露審計公費資訊。主管機關希望藉此讓財務報導使用者可以瞭解公司支付給會計師事務所之審計公費是否存在太低之情況,進而讓財務報導使用者能主動關切與監督財務報導盈餘品質。本文發現若公司從大型會計師事務所更換至另一大型會計師事務所,且繼任之會計師事務所收取之審計公費降低時,確實會降低投資人在財務報導盈餘品質的認知。此外,當公司控制股東擔任董監事席次的比率較高,則公司更換事務所且審計公費降低,對投資人盈餘品質的認知信心的衝擊效果會更明顯。

(148_M5f69a082b157b_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(中文)

審計公費、初次查核、盈餘品質認知


摘要(英文)

Public companies which issue securities are required to disclose the audit fees when the initial audit fees of succeeding audit firms discounted since 2002. The authorities want to let financial statements users realize whether the audit fees paid to audit firms are deficient or not and make them actively concern and watch over the earnings quality of financial statement. The result of this study indicates that the investors’ perception to lower earnings quality is obvious when the initial audit fees paid to succeeding audit firm are discounted following the audit firm changes from one big audit firm to another big audit firm. Besides, the more directors and supervisors are controlled by controlling shareholders, the more reduction of investors’ confidence in earnings quality of financial statement.

(148_M5f69a082b157b_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(英文)

Audit Fees, Initial Auditing, Perception of Earnings Quality


政策與管理意涵

依據「公開發行公司年報應行記載事項準則」之規範,國內從2002年開始,證券發行公司若有更換會計師事務所,且更換年度所支付的審計公費,較更換前一年度的審計公費減少者,應該揭露審計公費之資訊。主管機關希望強制要求公司揭露審計公費資訊,讓財務報導使用者能夠自行監督與評估財務報導盈餘品質。本文發現當公司從大型會計師事務所更換至另一大型會計師事務所時,若繼任之會計師事務所收取之審計公費降低,則會降低投資人對於財務報導盈餘品質的信心。特別是控制股東擔任董監事的比率較高,則衝擊財務報導使用者信心的程度越高。換句話說,當公司從大型會計師事務所更換至另一大型會計師事務所時,若繼任之會計師事務所收取之審計公費降低,則投資人認為此乃因為大型會計師事務所彼此之間,採用價格競爭之方式爭取客戶,導致審計品質可能受到影響,進而衝擊其對於財務報導盈餘品質的信心。 當投資人發現一家公司由大型會計師事務所更換至另一大型會計師事務所,同時繼任的會計師事務所收取較低的審計公費時,普遍會認為上述係大型會計師事務所之間藉由降低審計公費以爭取客戶所導致,可能造成審計品質受到影響,而使得投資人對於財務報導盈餘品質形成疑慮。基於提升投資人對於財務報導品質的信心,是健全資本市場發展的重要因素。儘管目前文獻顯示會計師事務所收取的初次審計公費降低,並不一定會影響審計品質,但是,本文發現繼任之會計師事務所收取之初次審計公費降低時,卻會影響投資人對於財務報導盈餘品質的信心。因此,主管機關可能要思考是否需要擬定相關措施,以減少繼任之會計師事務所降低初次審計公費之情況,或是對於初次審計公費降低之公司,輔以更多財務報導品質之監督措施 (例如將財務報表列為實質審查之對象等),以避免投資人對於財務報導盈餘品質之信心受到影響,進而影響資本市場之健全發展。


參考文獻

李貴富、朱立倫、李書行,2011,「首次查核審計公費減少與會計師獨立性:以初具繼續經營疑慮之查核意見為例」,證券市場發展季刊,23卷3期:1~38。(Li, K. F., Chu, L. L., and Li, S. H., 2011, “Fee Cutting on Initial Engagement and Auditors Independence: Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinion,” Review of Securities and Futures Markets, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1-38.)
林孝倫、林嬋娟,2013,「臺灣審計研究之回顧與前瞻」,會計審計論叢,3卷1期:1~47。(Lin, H. L. and Lin, C. J., 2013, “Auditing Research in Taiwan: Review and Prospect,” Review of Accounting and Auditing Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1-47.)
林嬋娟、林孝倫、羅勝議,2015,「我國上市(櫃)公司審計公費資訊揭露對後續公費訂定之影響」,中華會計學刊,11卷2期:203~239。(Lin, C. J., Lin H. L., and Lo, S. Y., 2015, “Impact of the Fee Disclosure Requirement on Subsequent Period Fees: Evidence from Taiwan,” Taiwan Accounting Review, Vol. 11, No. 2, 203-239.)
俞洪昭、戚務君、李承易,2000,「我國會計師受懲戒原因與種類之關聯性分析」,風險管理學報,2卷2期:37~56。(Yu, H. C., Chi, W. C., and Lee, C. I., 2000, “The Association between Professional Deficiencies and Auditor Sanction Types-An Analysis of Auditor’s Sanction Cases in Taiwan,” Journal of Risk Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, 37-56.)
許恩得,2010,「市場結構、審計品質與簽證價值」,管理評論,29卷3期:65~77。(Hsu, E. T., 2010, “On Market Structure, Audit Quality and Attestation Value,” Management Review, Vol. 29, No. 3, 65-77.)
許恩得、王泰昌,2009,「審計公費下限與審計品質」,臺大管理論叢,20卷1期:261~288。(Hsu, E. T. and Wang, T. C., 2009, “Audit Fee Floor and Audit Quality,” NTU Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, 261-288.)
陳皆碩、林芳綺、楊東錦,2015,「審計公費調降之決定因素:公司治理之觀點」,中華會計學刊,11卷2期:241~290。(Chen, C. S., Lin, F. C., and Yang, T. C., 2015, “The Determinants of Audit Fee Decreases: The Perspective of Corporate Governance,” Taiwan Accounting Review, Vol. 11, No. 2, 241-290.)
陳耀宗、劉若蘭、林坤霖,2003,「產業專家、客戶滿意度與審計公費關聯性之研究」,會計評論,37期:31~52。(Chen, K. Y., Liu, J. L., and Lin, K. L., 2003, “Industry Specialist, Client Satisfaction and Audit Fees,” Journal of Accounting Review, Vol. 37, 31-52.)
詹素嬌、蘇淑慧、劉正淮,2014,「投保董監事責任險與保險金額於審計公費之影響」,會計審計論叢,4卷1期:25~51。(Chan, S. C., Sue, S. H., and Liou, C. H., 2014, “Does Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance Matter to Audit Fee?,” Review of Accounting and Auditing Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, 25-51. )
廖秀梅、王貞靜、戚務君,2012,「一套臺灣完整的審計公費資訊告訴我們什麼?」,中華會計學刊,8卷1期:49~88。(Liao, H. M., Wang, C. C., and Chi, W. C., 2012, “What Does the Complete Disclosure of Audit Fee Information Tell Us in Taiwan?,” Taiwan Accounting Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, 49-88.)
Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., and Mayhew, B., 2003, “Do Nonaudit Service Compromise Auditor Independence? Further Evidence,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 78, No. 3, 611-639.
Atiase, R., 1987, “Market Implications of Predisclosure Information: Size and Exchange Effects,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 168-175.
Baber, W. R., Krishnan, J., and Zhang, Y., 2014, “Investor Perceptions of the Earnings Quality Consequences of Hiring an Affiliated Auditor,” Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 19, No. 1, 69-102.
Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., and Yang, J. S., 2003, “Auditor Industry Specialization and Earnings Quality,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 22, No. 2, 71-97.
Blankley, A. I., Hurtt, D. N., and MacGregor, J. E., 2012, “Abnormal Audit Fees and Restatements,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 31, No. 1, 79-96.
Caramanis, C. and Lennox, C., 2008, “Audit Effort and Earnings Management,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 45, No. 1, 116-138.
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, L. T., and Riley, J. A. R., 2002, “Board Characteristics and Audit Fees,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, 365-384.
Cassell, C. A., Giroux, G. A., Myers, L. A., and Omer, T. C., 2012, “The Effect of Corporate Governance on Auditor-Client Realignments,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 31, No. 2, 167-188.
Chen, L. H., Krishnan, J., Sami, H., and Zhou, H., 2013, “Auditor Attestation under SOX Section 404 and Earnings Informativeness,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 32, No. 1, 61-84.
Choi, J. H., Doogar, R. K., and Ganguly, A. R., 2004, “The Riskiness of Large Audit Firm Client Portfolios and Changes in Audit Liability Regimes: Evidence from the U.S. Audit Market,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, 747-785.
DeAngelo, L. E., 1981, “Auditor Independence, Low Balling and Disclosure Regulation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3, No. 2, 113-127.
Dechow, P., Ge, W., and Schrand, C., 2010, “Understanding Earnings Quality: A Review of Proxies, Their Determinants and Their Consequences,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 50, No. 2-3, 344-410.
DeFond, M. L. and Jiambalvo. J., 1994, “Debt Covenant Violations and Manipulation of Accruals,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 17, No. 1-2, 145-176.
Desir, R., Casterella, J., and Konina, J., 2014, “A Reexamination of Audit Fees for Initial Audit Engagements in the Post-SOX Period,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 33, No. 2, 59-78.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Lee, K. J., and Fargher, N. L., 1991, “The Association between Unexpected Earnings and Abnormal Security Returns in the Presence of Financial Leverage,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 20-41.
Dies, D. and Giroux, G., 1996, “The Effect of Auditor Changes on Audit Fees, and Audit Hours, and Audit Quality,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 15, No. 1, 55-76.
Dopuch, N. and King, R. R., 1996, “The Effects of Lowballing on Audit Quality: An Experimental Market Study,” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Vol. 11, No. 1, 45-68.
Dye, R., 1991, “Informationally Motivated Auditor Replacement,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 14, No. 4, 347-374.
Eilifsen, A. and Knivsfla, K. H., 2013, “How Increased Regulatory Oversight of Nonaudit Services Affects Investors’ Perceptions of Earnings Quality,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 32, No. 1, 85-112.
Francis, J. R. and Ke, B., 2006, “Disclosure of Fees Paid to Auditors and the Market Valuation of Earnings Surprises,” Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 11, No. 4, 495-523.
Francis, J., Schipper, K., and Vincent, L., 2005, “Earnings and Dividends Informativeness when Cash Flow Rights are Separated from Voting Rights,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 39, No. 2, 329-360.
Geiger, M. A. and Raghunandan, K., 2002, “Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting Failures,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 21, No. 1, 67-80.
Ghosh, A. and Moon, D., 2005, “Audit Tenure and Perceptions of Audit Quality,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 80, No. 2, 585-612.
Griffin, P. A. and Lont, D. H., 2011, “Auditor Fees Around Dismissals and Resignations: Additional Evidence,” Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Vol. 7, No. 2, 65-81.
Gul, F. A., Fung, S., and Jaggi, B., 2009, “Earnings Quality: Some Evidence on the Role of Auditor Tenure and Auditors’ Industry Expertise,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 47, No. 3, 265-287.
Haw, I. M., Hu, B., Hwang, L. S., and Wu, W., 2004, “Ultimate Ownership, Income Management, and Legal and Extra-Legal Institutions,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 42, No. 2, 423-462.
Higgs, J. L. and Skantz, T. R., 2006, “Audit and Nonaudit Fees and the Market’s Reaction to Earnings Announcements,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1-26.
Ho, J. L. and Kang, F., 2013, “Auditor Choice and Audit Fees in Family Firms: Evidence from the S&P 1500,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 32, No.4, 71-93.
Huang, H. W., Raghunandan, K., Huang, T. C., and Chiou, J. R., 2015, “Fee Discounting and Audit Quality Following Audit Firm and Audit Partner Changes: Chinese Evidence,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 90, No. 4, 1517-1546.
Kraub, P., Quosigk, B. M., and Zulch, H., 2014, “Effects of Initial Audit Fee Discounts on Audit Quality: Evidence from Germany,” International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 18, No. 1, 40-56.
Krishnan, J., Sami, H., and Zhang, Y., 2005, “Does the Provision of Nonaudit Services Affect Investor Perceptions of Auditor Independence?,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 24, No. 2, 111-135.
Larcker, D. F. and Richardson, S. A., 2004, “Fees Paid to Audit Firms, Accrual Choices and Corporate Governance,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 42, No. 3, 625-658.
Lennox, C., 2000, “Do Companies Successfully Engage in Opinion-Shopping? Evidence form the UK,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 29, No. 3, 321-337.
Lim, C. Y., Ding, D. K., and Charoenwong, C., 2013, “Non-Audit Fees, Institutional Monitoring, and Audit Quality,” Review of Quantitative Finance Accounting, Vol. 41, No. 2, 343-384.
Reynolds, J. K., Dies, D. R., and Francis, J. R., 2004, “Professional Service Fees and Auditor Objectivity,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 23, No. 1, 29-52.
Sarkar, J., Sarkar, S., and Kaustav, S., 2008, “Board of Directors and Opportunistic Earnings Management: Evidence from India,” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Vol. 23, No. 4, 517-551.
Teoh, S. H. and Wong, T. J., 1993, “Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 68, No. 2, 346-366.
Warfield, T., Wild, J., and Wild, K., 1995, “Managerial Ownership, Accounting Choices, and Informativeness of Earnings,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 61-91.
Woo, E. S. and Koh, H. C., 2001, “Factors Associated with Auditor Changes: A Singapore Study,” Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 31, No. 2, 133-144.
Yang, Y. J., Kang, J., Lin, R. C., and Ronen, J., 2016, “Auditor Selection within A Business Group: Evidence from Taiwan,” Review of Quantitative Finance Accounting, Vol. 46, No. 2, 195-215.
Zhang, P., 1999, “A Bargaining Model of Auditor Reporting,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, 167-184.