中山管理評論

  期刊全文閱覽

中山管理評論  2020/3

第28卷第1期  p.67-119

DOI:10.6160/SYSMR.202003_28(1).0002


題目
企業採用管理法對於營運部門財務報導揭露品質之影響
A Study of the Firms to Adoption of Management Approach on the Quality of Business Segment Reporting
(146_M5e7328955006e_Full.pdf 1,221KB)

作者
彭智偉/國立彰化師範大學會計學系
Chih-Wei Peng/

Department of Accounting, National Changhua University of Education


摘要(中文)

為了協助外部報表使用者得以瞭解公司各營運單位的風險與價值創造力,我國自2011年1月1日隨即實施財務會計準則公報第41號公報「營運部門資訊之揭露」,規定企業由過去「產業法」改為「管理法」來辨認並衡量營運部門績效。本文之首要目的即在檢測我國企業採用管理法成效。其次,本文進一步探討「專屬資訊成本」及「董事會治理成效」兩因素之調節效果。本文以2011年為基準,以手工方式搜集2009年下半年至2012年上半年上市公司之營運部門財務資料。實證結果指出,在實施管理法之後:(1)平均而言,我國企業營運部門報導的品質有提升;(2)專屬資訊成本越高的企業,營運部門報導品質反而表現越差;(3)董事會治理成效越佳企業,營運部門報導的品質表現越佳。

(146_M5e7328955006e_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(中文)

財務會計準則第41號公報、管理法、營運部門報導、專屬資訊成本、董事會治理


摘要(英文)

Taiwan’s Financial Accounting Standards Committee adopted the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No.41 on January 1, 2011, in order to help users of the financial statements to better understand the potential risk and value of different segments. Firms thus need to reveal more about their various business segments after switching from an industry-based approach to a management-based approach. The first purpose of this study is thus to examine whether the management approach increases the quality of business segment reporting. In addition, this study also extends prior works and investigates the effects of “proprietary cost” and “board governance” on the quality of business segment reporting. Using a sample from the second half of 2009 to the first half of 2012, for a total of six half-year periods, this study hand-collected segment financial data to measure the quality of segment disclosure. The results indicate that: (1) on average, adopting the management approach improves the transparency of business segment reporting; (2) firms with high proprietary costs will have a lower quality of business segment reporting; (3) firms with good board governance will have a higher quality of business segment reporting.

(146_M5e7328955006e_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(英文)

SFAS No. 41, Management Approach, Segment Reporting, Proprietary Cost, Board Governance


政策與管理意涵

本研究探討我國財務會計準則第41號公報,將營運部門報導方法由「產業法」改為「管理法」,對於企業營運部門報導品質之影響效果,以台灣2009年下半年至2012年上半年上市公司為樣本,實證分析後發現,企業採用管理法後,營運部門的報導品質有顯著提升。本研究之結果隱含,企業採用管理法相較於產業法,降低企業內部及外部報表使用者財務資訊不對稱現象,提高外部報表使用者評價企業在多角化經營環境所帶來的潛在風險與獲利能力。因此,本研究能提供管制者評估第41號公報實施成效的重要參考依據。 本研究實證結果也發現,電子業中專屬資訊成本越高的公司,就算第41公報強制規範企業依管理法精神揭露營運部門資訊,企業仍然會依循該公報給予的裁量空間,盡可能減少營運部門資訊的揭露。然而,當公司有健全的董事會治理機制來搭配時,能有效提升提董事會監督管理者財務報導行為,此時營運部門財務揭露的品質較佳。此結果在實務管理上有以下意涵。一、鑑於我國仍有多數公司採用單一營運部門說法,降低營運部門報導品質,為了提升財務報表資訊透明度,在政策上,本研究建議我國在全面採行國際會計準則公報之際,應加強會計相關人員對於新公報規定的教育訓練,充份與企業溝通提升財務報表資訊透明度的效益,例如:減少編製額外報表的成本或取得較佳融資條件等,要求企業確實落實相關會計準備的規範。二、管制者也可以從健全董事會治理機制著手,此機制能發揮董事會監督管理者營運部門財務報導揭露行為,俾能保障廣大投資者之基本利益。 最後,會計師在查核專屬資訊成本較高公司時,應加強注意企業營運部門的揭露是否合理及是否允當,俾能傳遞給投資人更具可靠性之財務資訊。同時,投資人在使用營運部門資訊作投資決策時,可以進一步考量「專屬資訊成本」及「董事會治理成效」等因素之影響,適當地調整該盈餘資訊決策的權重。


參考文獻

江美艷、王淑玲、蔡素芬,2008,「財會41 號公報新思維 - 依內部管理報告辨認營運部門」,勤業眾信通訊,11月:1~8。(Jiang, M. Y., Wang, S. L., and Tsai, S. F., 2008, “New Thinking on SFAS No. 41 - The Disclosure of Segment Reporting Is Reported on the Basis That It Is Used Unternally for Evaluating Segment Performance,” Deloitte Monthly, November, 1-8.)
林美花,2012,高級會計學,六版,台北:指南書局。(Lin, M. W., 2012, Advanced Accounting, 6th, Taipei, TW: Compass Publishing Co., Ltd.)
林欣美、郭麗華、蘇迺惠,2008,「國際化程度、董事會結構、精練法人監督對盈餘管理之影響:以台灣資訊電子業爲例」,臺大管理論叢,19卷1期:157~186。(Lin, H. M., Kuo, B. L., and Su, N. H., 2008, “The Influence of Internationalization, Board Characteristics, and Sophisticated Institutional Evidence from Information and Electronics Industries in Taiwan,” NTU Management Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, 157-186.)
林儀瑄,2014,我國財務會計準則公報第41號[營運部門資訊揭露] 之揭露實務調查-以台灣50 指數公司為例,成功大學財務金融研究所碩士在職專班論文。(Lin, Y. H., 2014, A Survey of Disclosure Practices on Taiwan SFAS No.41 “The Disclosure of Segment Reporting” :The Case of FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 Index Companies, Master Thesis, National Cheng Kung University.)
周建宏,2008,「IFRS接軌的挑戰」,會計研究月刊,276期:72~77。(Chou, J. H., 2008,“The Challenges of Implementing IFRS,” Accounting Research Monthly, No. 276, 72-77.)
周建宏,2009,「《迎接IFRS系列九》:營運部門別報導」,資誠通訊,229期:18~23。(Chou, J. H., 2009, “The Challenges of Implementing IFRS, Series 9:The Disclosure of Segment Reporting,” PricewaterhouseCoopers Monthly, No. 229, 18-23.)
許振隆,2008,「我國財務會計準則公報第四十一號「營運部門資訊之揭露」草案對企業的影響與衝擊」,安侯建業通訊,11月:10~11。(Hsu, C, L., 2008, “An Analysis of the Impact of Adopting SFAS No. 41 “The Disclosure of Segment Reporting” on the Segment Disclosures of Taiwan Companies,” KPMG Monthly, November, 10-11.)
陳依蘋,2002,「透明度與企業價值」,會計研究月刊,第200期:48~54。(Chen, Y, P., 2002, “Transparency and Enterprise Value,” Accounting Research Monthly, No. 200, 48-54.)
陳佳輝、陳育成,2013,「臺灣財務會計準則轉換為國際財務報導準則期間之企業盈餘品質」,中華會計學刊,9卷2期:159~189。(Chen, C. H. and Chen, Y. C., 2013, “Earnings Quality during SFAS-to-IFRS Conversion in Taiwan,” Taiwan Accounting Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 159-189.)
陳振遠、張智堯、王蘭芬、李文智,2004,「應用Ohlson會計評價模型探究公司治理之價值攸關性-以台灣上市公司電子業為例」,臺大管理論叢,15卷2期:123~141。(Chen, C. Y., Chang, C. Y., Wang, L. F., and Lee, W. C., 2004, “The Ohlson Valuation Framework and Value-Relevance of Corporate Governance: An Empirical Analysis of the Electronic Industry in Taiwan,” NTU Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, 123-141.)
戚務君、陳宜伶,2008,「資本市場對盈餘品質的影響:來自臺灣的證據」,管理學報,27卷2期:53~69。(Chi, W. C. and Chen, Y. L., 2008, “How the Capital Market Affects Earnings Quality: Evidence from Taiwan,” Journal of Management and Business Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, 53-69.)
曾乾豪、王怡心、王雅青、薛敏正,2015,「內部控制缺失與財務報表品質間之關聯性–來自新上市公司的證據」,管理與系統,22卷3期:303~373。(Tseng, C. H., Wang, Y. H., Wang, Y. C., and Shiue, M. J., 2015, “The Relation between the Internal Control Weakness and the Quality of Financial Reports: Evidence from IPO Firms,” Journal of Management and Systems, Vol. 22, No. 3, 303-373.)
楊麗玲,2013,「強制性規定揭露營運部門別資訊之增額資訊內涵實證研究」,中華科技大學學報,56期,21~33。(Yang, L, L., 2013, “Empirical Research on Mandated Segment Data Disclosure Incremental Information Content,” Journal of China University of Science and Technology, No. 56, 21-33.)
廖益興、楊清溪,2007,「公司治理機制與財務報表品質之關聯性研究」,財務金融學刊,15卷3期:67~112。(Liao, Y. H. and Yang, C. H., 2007, “Association between Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Quality of Financial Statements,” Journal of Financial Studies, Vol. 15, No. 3, 67-112.)
賴睦穎、陳昶毓,2013,「營運部門資訊揭露之觀察:一般產業」,信用風險評估專刊,9月:111~114。(Lai, M. Y. and Chen, C. Y., 2013, “A Survey of Disclosure Practices on Operating Segments: General Industry,” Journal of Credit Risk Evaluation, September, 111-114.)
Ahmed, A. S., Neel, M., and Wang, D., 2013, “Does Mandatory Adoption of IFRS Improve Accounting Quality? Preliminary Evidence,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1344-1372.
Ali, A., Klasa, S., and Yeung, E., 2010, “Industry Concentration and Corporate Disclosure Policy,” Working Paper, University of Texas Dallas.
Alia, A., Chen, T. Y., and Radhakrishnan, S., 2007, “Corporate Disclosures by Family Firms,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 44, No. 1-2, 238-286.
Anderson, R. C. and Reeb, D. M., 2003, “Founding Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 58, No. 3, 1301-1328.
Armstrong, C. S., Barth, M. E., Jagolinzer, A. D., and Riedl, E. J., 2010, “Market Reaction to Events Surrounding the Adoption of IFRS in Europe,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 85, No. 1, 31-61.
Ball, R., 2006, “International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and Cons for Investors,” Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 36, No. 1, 5-27.
Barth, M., Landsman, W., and Lang, M., 2008, “International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 46, No. 3, 467-498.
Bathala, C. T. and Rao, R. P., 1995, “The Determinants of Board Composition: An Agency Theory Perspective,” Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 16, No.1, 59-69.
Berger, P. G. and Hann, R., 2003, “The Impact of SFAS 131 on Information and Monitoring,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 41, No. 2, 163-222.
Berger, P. G. and Hann, R., 2003, “Segment Profitability and the Proprietary Costs of Disclosure,” Working Paper, University of Southern California.
Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., and Terry, R. L., 1994, “Outside Directors and the Adoption of Poison Pills,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 35, No. 3, 371-390.
Botosan, C. A. and Stanford, M., 2005, “Managers’ Motives to Withhold Segment Disclosures and the Effect of SFAS No. 131 on Analysts’ Information Environment,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 80, No. 3, 751-771.
Bushman, R., Piotroski, J., and Smith, A., 2011, “Capital Allocation and Timely Accounting Recognition of Eeconomic Losses,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 38, No. 1-2, 1-33.
Cheng, C. S. A., Hsieh, S. J., and Yip, Y., 2007, “Impact of Accounting Choices on Firm Valuation and Earnings Quality: The Case of Transition Obligation Under SFAS 106,” Review of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 6, No. 4, 419-441.
Clarkson, P., Kao, J., and Richardson, G., 1994, “The Voluntary Inclusion of Forecasts in the MD&A Section of Annual Reports,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No.1, 423-450.
Collins, D. W., Kothari, S. P., Shanken, J., and Sloan, R., 1994, “Lack of Timeliness and Noise as Explanations for the Low Contemporaneous Return-Earning Association,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 18, No.3, 289-324.
Dechow, P. and Dichev, I., 2002, “The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 77, Supplement, 35-59.
DeFond, M. and Jiambalvo, J.,1994, “Debt Covenant Violation and Manipulation of Accruals,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 17, No.1-2, ,145-176.
Diamond, D. W. and Verrecchia, R. E., 1987, “Constraints on Short-Selling and Asset Price Adjustment to Private Information,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 18, No. 2, 277-311.
Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989, “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 532-551.
Ettredge, M., Kwon, S. Y., Smith, D. S., and Stone, M., 2006, “The Effect of SFAS No. 131 on the Cross-Segment Variability of Profits by Multiple Segment Firms,” Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 11, No.1, 91-117.
Ettredge, M., Kwon, S. Y., Smith, D., and Zarowin, P., 2005, “The Impact of SFAS No. 131 Business Segment Data on the Market’s Ability to Anticipate Future Earnings,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 80, No. 3, 773-804.
Frankel, R. and Li, X., 2004, “Characteristics of a Firm's Information Environment and the Information Asymmetry between Insiders and Outsiders,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 37, No. 2, 229-259.
Giroud, X. and Mueller, H. M., 2011, “Corporate Governance, Product Market Competition, and Equity Prices,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 66, No. 2, 563-600.
Gu, Z., Lee, C. W. J., and Rosett, J. G., 2005, “What Determines the Variability of Accounting Accruals?” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 24, No. 3, 313-334.
Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C., 1998, Multivariate Analysis, 5th, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Harris, M. S., 1998, “The Association between Competition and Managers’ Business Segment Reporting Decisions,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 36, No.1, 111-128.
Hayes, R. M. and Lundholm, R., 1996, “Segment Reporting to the Capital Market in the Presence of a Competitor,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 34, No. 2, 261-279.
Heckman, J., 1979, “Sample Selection as A Specification Error,” Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 1, 153-161.
Herrmann, D. and Thomas,W., 2000, “An Analysis of Segment Disclosures under SFAS No. 131 and SFAS No. 14,” Accounting Horizons, Vol. 14, No. 3, 287-302.
Hope, O. K., Thomas, W. B., and Vyas, D., 2013, “Financial Reporting Quality of U.S. Private and Public Firms,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 88, No. 5, 1715-1742.
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H., 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, 305-360.
Klein, A., 2002, “Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management, ” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33 No. 3, 375-400.
Knutson, P. H., 1993, Financial Reporting in the 1990s and Beyond: A Position Paper, 1st, Charlottesville: VA, CFA Institute.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A., 1999, “Corporate Ownership Around the World,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, No. 2, 471-517.
Landsman, W. R., Maydew, E. L., and Thornock, J. R. 2012. “The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements and Mandatory Adoption of IFRS,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 53, No. 1-2, 34-54.
Lang, M. and Lundholm, R., 1993, “Cross-sectional Determinants of Analyst Ratings of Corporate Disclosure,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 31, No. 2, 246-271.
Lang, M. H. and Lundholm, R. J., 1996, “Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behavior,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 467-492.
Lechner, M., 2010, “The Estimation of Causal Effects by Difference-in-Difference Methods,” Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, Vol. 4, No. 3, 165-224.
Leibenstein, H., 1996, “Allocative Efficiency vs. “X-Efficiency”,” American Economic Review, Vol. 56, No. 3, 392-415.
Li, X., 2010, “The Impacts of Product Market Competition on the Quantity and Quality of Voluntary Disclosures,” Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 15, No. 3, 663-711.
Lundholm, R. and Myers, L., 2002, “Bringing the Future Forward: The Effect of Disclosure on the Returns-Earnings Relation,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 40, No. 3, 809-839.
Machlup, F., 1967, “Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral, Managerial,” American Economic Review, Vol. 57, 1-33.
Maddala, G., 2001, Introduction to Econometrics, 3rd, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Maines, L., McDaniel, L., and Harris, M., 1997, “Implications of Proposed Segment Reporting Standards for Financial Analysts’ Investment Decisions,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 35, 1-24.
Masulis, R., Wang, C., and Xie, F., 2007, “Corporate Governance and Acquirer Returns,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 62, No. 4, 1851-1889.
Mensah, Y. M. and Werner, R. H., 2008, “The Capital Market Implications of the Frequency of Interim Financial Reporting: An International Analysis Preview,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 31, No. 1, 71-104
Miller, B., 2010, “The Effects of Reporting Complexity on Small and Large Investor Trading,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 85, No. 6, 2107-2143.
Nelson, M. W., 2003, “Behavioral Evidence on the Effects of Principles- and Rules-Based Standards,” Accounting Horizons, Vol. 17, No. 1, 91-105.
Rhoades, S. A., 1993, “The Efficiency Effects of Horizontal Bank Mergers,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 17, No. 2-3, 411-22.
Schipper, K., 2003, “Principles-Based Accounting Standards,” Accounting Horizons, Vol. 17, No. 1, 61-72.
Sengupta, P., 1998, “Corporate Disclosure Quality and the Cost of Debt,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 73, No. 4, 459-474.
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., 1997, “A Survey of Corporate Governance,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 2, 737-783.
Soderstrom, N. and Sun, K., 2007, “IFRS Adoption and Accounting Quality: A Review,” European Accounting Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, 675-702.
Street, D., Nicols, N., and Gray, S., 2000, “Segment Disclosures under SFAS No. 131: Has Business Segment Reporting Improved?” Accounting Horizons, Vol. 14, No. 3, 259-285.
Tirole, J., 2001, “Corporate Governance,” Econometrica, Vol. 69, No. 1, 1-35.
Taso, S. M., Lin, C. H., and Chen, V. Y. S., 2015, “Family Ownership as a Moderator between R&D Investment and CEO Compensation,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68, No. 3, 599-606.
Verrecchia, R., 1983, “Discretionary Disclosure,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 5, 179-194.
Warfield, T., Wild, J., and Wild, K., 1995, “Managerial Ownership, Accounting Choices, and Informativeness of Earnings,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 20, No.1, 61-91.
Watts, R. and Zimmerman, J., 1978, “Towards A Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 56, No. 1, 112-134.
Watts R. and Zimmerman, J., 1990, “Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 65, No1, 131-157.
Weisbach, M. S., 1988, “Outsider Directors and CEO Turnover,” Journal Financial Economics, Vol. 20, No. 1/2, 431-460.
White, H., 1980, “A Heteroskedasiticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity,” Econometrica, Vol. 48, No. 4, 817-838.