中山管理評論

  期刊全文閱覽

中山管理評論  2017/6

第25卷第2期  p.367-398

DOI:10.6160/2017.06.03


題目
董事會政治關聯、客戶重要性對財務報導舞弊之影響
Impacts of Board Political Connection and Client Importance on Fraudulent Financial Reporting
(136_M5a1e6c3c85862_Full.pdf 1,399KB)

作者
劉若蘭、李旻育/臺中科技大學會計資訊系、安侯建業會計師事務所
Jo-Lan Liu, Min-Yu Li/

Department of Accounting Information, National Taichung University of Science and Technology; Department of Auditing, KPMG Taiwan Taipei Office


摘要(中文)

本研究探討董事會政治關聯以及公司對會計師的重要性,對公司發生財務報導舞弊之影響。實證結果發現,董事會具政治關聯的公司,財務報導舞弊發生率較低。受查公司對簽證會計師的重要性愈高,會因為會計師對客戶的經濟依賴效果大於聲譽維護效果,而導致財務報導舞弊發生的機率增加。由四大會計師事務所查核與公司支付審計公費較高,能降低財務報導舞弊的發生率。在公司治理變數方面,核心代理成本愈高,發生財務報導舞弊的機率愈高,而獨立董事席次比、機構投資人持股比率、董監事持股比率,能夠降低財務報導舞弊發生之風險。本研究之實證結果支持公司的董事會成員具政治關聯以及會計師事務所透過品質管制以強化會計師的獨立性,皆有助於提升公司治理品質,進而降低財務報導舞弊的風險。

(136_M5a1e6c3c85862_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(中文)

董事會政治關聯、客戶重要性、財務報導舞弊


摘要(英文)

This study examines the impacts of board political connection and client importance on fraudulent financial reporting. The empirical results reveal that firms with board political connection have lower occurrence rate of fraudulent financial reporting. However, client importance is significantly positively associated with the incidence of fraudulent reporting because the effect of economic dependence is stronger than the concerns of reputation protection for the auditors. Firms that were audited by Big-4 and paid higher fees have lower occurrence rate of fraudulent financial reporting. As to the corporate governance variables, firms with higher core agency costs have higher likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Firms with higher percentage of independent directors on the board, institutional investor ownership, and director and supervisor ownership have lower likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. The empirical results support that having politically connected board of directors in the firm can improve corporate governance as well as having audit firms that strengthen their independence through quality control. With improved corporate governance quality, firms therefore can mitigate the incidence of fraudulent financial reporting.

(136_M5a1e6c3c85862_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(英文)

Board Political Connection, Client Importance, Fraudulent Financial Reporting


政策與管理意涵

本文的實證結果,可以了解董事會成員具有政治背景等經驗,能夠盡到監督財務報導品質的責任,進而降低財務報導舞弊之發生率。會計師面對重要客戶時的經濟依賴效果大於聲譽維護效果,導致財務報導舞弊風險增加。在我國的自由民主經濟環境下,董事會成員的政治背景知識能為公司帶來好的公司治理品質,抑制不實財務報導的風險,有助於內部公司治理品質之提升。而且加強會計師的獨立性,可降低受查客戶的經濟誘因對審計品質之影響,有助於強化外部公司治理品質。公司有健全的財務狀況、充裕的現金流量,以及較低的負債比率,可減緩財務報導舞弊的發生率。降低公司的核心代理成本,減緩控制股東與小股東的利益衝突,以及強化獨立董事的功能也可降低公司發生財務報導舞弊的風險。 公司治理的課題主要為如何在公司所有者與經營者之間建構一個制衡機制,調和兩者間的利益與防範衝突發生。本文以公司曾被提起集體訴訟者作為衡量財務報導舞弊的直接證據,可補充間接衡量財務報導舞弊研究的不足,本文結果能對公司治理、財務報導舞弊等文獻提供新的實證證據,並且可供公司在尋找董監事成員時,所需具備的知識與背景,以及會計師事務所品質管制的參考依據;亦可供主管機關制定公司治理等規範之參考。


參考文獻

李建然、陳政芳,2004,「審計客戶重要性與盈餘管理:以五大事務所組別為觀察標的」,會計評論,38期:59-80。(Lee, J. Z. and Chen, J. F., 2004, “The Effect of Audit Client’s Importance on Magnitude of Earnings Management: From the Perspective of Audit Groups within the Big Five,” The International Journal of Accounting Studies, Vol. 38, No. 1, 59-80.)
李春安、徐傳瑛,2010,「董事會獨立性與企業財務危機關係之研究」,管理與系統,17卷3期:467-499。(Li, C. A. and Hsu, C. Y., 2010, “Board Independence and Financial Distress: Evidence from Taiwan,” Journal of Management & Systems, Vol. 17, No. 3, 467-499.)
官月緞、郭子建,2011,「客戶重要性、非審計服務與會計師任期對審計品質之影響」,當代會計,12卷1期:1~30。(Guan, Y. D. and Kuo, T. C., “The Impact of Client Importance, Non-audit Service, and Auditor Tenure on Audit Quality,” Journal of Contemporary Accounting, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1-30.)
林宛瑩、許崇源、戚務君、陳宜伶,2009,「公司治理與信用風險」,臺大管理論叢,19卷S2期:71~98。(Lin, W. Y., Hsu, C. Y., Chi, W. C., and Chen, I. L., 2009, “Corporate Governance and Credit Risk,” NTU Management Review, Vol. 19, No. S2, 71-98.)
林嬋娟、張哲嘉,2009,「董監事異常變動、家族企業與企業舞弊之關聯性」,會計評論,48期:1~33。(Lin, C. J. and Chang, C. C., 2009, “Abnormal Change of Board Members, Family Firms and Fraud,” The International Journal of Accounting Studies, Vol. 48, No. 1, 1-33.)
姚珊珊,2014,「政治關聯與財務困境恢復—基於ST上市公司[摘帽]的實證研究」,兩岸金融季刊,2卷2期:29~44。(Yao, S. S., 2014, “Political Connections and Financial Distress Recovery: Based on ST Firms Uncapped Empirical Study,” Cross-Sreait Banking and Finance, Vol. 2, No. 2, 29-44.)
翁慈青、紀信義,2014,「董事會政治背景與企業信用風險之關係」,證券市場發展季刊,26卷2期:43~90。(Weng, T. C. and Chi, H. Y., 2014, “Political connection and Credit Risk,” Review of Securities and Futures Markets, Vol. 26, No. 2, 43-90.)
張琬喻、張凱雯,2011,「董事政治關聯及政治獻金影響企業價值嗎?」,選舉研究,18卷1期:139~174。(Jang, W. Y. and Chang, K. W., 2011, “Do Directorate Political Connections and /or Political Donations Affect Firm Value?” Journal of Electoral Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, 139-174.)
陳安琳、高蘭芬、陳怡凱、陳烷鈺,2013,「董監事股權質押與公司治理之研究」,中山管理評論,21卷2期:299~337。(Chen, A., Kao, L., Chen, Y. K., and Chen, W. Y., 2013, “Share Collateralization by Directors and Corporate Governance,” Sun Yat-sen Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 299-337.)
黃玉麗、沈中華、林昆立,2012,「政治關聯(係)與債務資金成本」,管理學報,29卷2期:155~185。(Huang, Y. L., Shen, C. H., and Lin, K. L., 2012, “Political Connections and the Cost of Debt,” Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 2, 155-185.)
楊炎杰、官月緞,2006,「客戶重要性與非審計服務是否影響審計品質? Enron後的觀察」,會計評論,43期:27~61。(Yang, Y. J. and Guan, Y. D., 2006, “Do Client Importance and Nonaudit Services Affect Audit Quality? Post-Enron Observation,” The International Journal of Accounting Studies, Vol. 43, No. 1, 27-61.)
廖秀梅、王貞靜、戚務君,2012,「一套臺灣完整的審計公費資訊告訴我們什麼?」,中華會計學刊,8期1卷:49~88。(Liao, H. M., Wang, C. C., and Chi, W. C., 2012, “What does th complete Disclosure of Audit Fee Information Tell Us in Taiwan?” Taiwan Accounting Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, 49-88.)
Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., and Mayhew, B. W., 2003, “Do Nonaudit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? Further evidence,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 78, No. 3, 611-639.
Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., and Subramanyam, K. R., 1998, “The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1-24.
Borisova, G., Brockman, P., Salas, J. M., and Zagorchev, A., 2012, “Government Ownership and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the EU,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 36, No. 11, 2917-2934.
Bozec, Y. and Bozec, R., 2013, “Dominant Shareholders, Excess Control and Audit Fees in Canada,” International Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 4, No. 2, 119-142.
Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., and Parsley, D., 2011, “The Quality of Accounting Information in Politically Connected Firms,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 51, No. 1, 58-76.
Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., and Rui, O. M., 2006, “Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Fraud: Evidence from China,” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 12, No. 3, 424-448.
Chung, H. and Kallapur, S., 2003, “Client Importance, Nonaudit Services, and Abnormal Accruals,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, 931-955.
Cressey, D. R., 1953, Other People’s Money, 1st, Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.
DeAngelo, L. E., 1981, “Auditor Independence, “Lowballing,” and Disclosure Regulation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3, No. 2, 113-127.
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., and Sweeney, A. P., 1995, “Detecting Earnings Management,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 70, No. 2, 193-225.
DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., and Subramanyam, K. R., 2002, “Do Non-audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinions,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1247-1274.
Ding, S., Jia, C., Wu, Z., and Zhang, X., 2014, “Executive Political Connections and Firm Performance: Comparative Evidence from Privately-controlled and State-owned Enterprises,” International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 1, 153-167.
Duh, R. R., Lee, W. C., Lin, C. C., and Chu, J. P., 2007, “An Eexperimental Study on Non-audit Service and Auditor Decision: Pre- and Post-procomp Scandal,” Taiwan Accounting Study, Vol. 6, No. 2, 125-152.
Faccio, M., 2010, “Differences between Politically Connected and Nonconnected Firms: A Cross‐country Analysis,” Financial Management, Vol. 39, No. 3, 905-928.
Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., and McConnell, J. J., 2006, “Political Connections and Corporate Bailout,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 61, No. 6, 2597-2635.
Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C., 1983, “Separation of Ownership and Control,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 301-325.
Fan, J. P. and Wong, T. J., 2002, “Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 401-425.
Ferguson, M. J., Seow, G. S., and Young, D., 2004, “Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management: UK Evidence,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, 813-841.
Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., and Sun, X., 2009, “Political Connections and the Process of Going Public: Evidence from China,” Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 28, No. 4, 696-719.
Ghosh, A. and Pawlewicz, R., 2009, “The Impact of Regulation on Auditor Fees: Evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 28, No. 2, 171-197.
Guedhami, O., Pittman, J. A., and Saffar, W., 2014, “Auditor Choice in Politically Connected Firms,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 52, No. 1, 107-162.
Healy, P. M., 1985, “The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 85-107.
Heninger, W. G., 2001, “The Association between Auditor Litigation and Abnormal Accruals,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 76, No. 1, 111-126.
Higgs, J. L. and Skantz, T. R., 2006, “Audit and Nonaudit Fees and the Market's Reaction to Earnings Announcements,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1-26.
Hu, F. and Leung, S., 2012, “Appointment of Politically Connected Top Executives and Subsequent Firm Performance and Corporate Governance: Evidence from China’s Listed SOEs. ”, 2012 Financial Markets & Corporate Governance Conference, Bundoora, Australia.
Hunt, A. K. and Lulseged, A., 2007, “Client Importance and Non-Big 5 Auditors’ Reporting Decisions,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 26, No. 2, 212-248.
Kao, L., Chiou, J. R., and Chen, A., 2004, “The Agency Problems, Firm Performance and Monitoring Mechanisms: the Evidence from Collateralized Shares in Taiwan,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 12, No. 3, 389-401.
Krueger, A. O., 1974, “The Political Economy of the Rent-seeking Society,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 3, 291-303.
Kusnadi, Y. and Srinidhi, B., 2015, “Political Connections and Stock Price Informativeness: International Evidence,” http://ssrn.com/abstract=2547896, accessed on January 10, 2015.
Lee, T. S. and Yeh, Y. H., 2004, “Corporate Governance and Financial Distress: Evidence from Taiwan,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 12, No. 3, 378-388.
Leuz, C. and Oberholzer-Gee, F., 2006, “Political Relationships, Global Financing, and Corporate Transparency: Evidence from Indonesia,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 81, No. 2, 411-439.
Leuz, C., Nanda, D., and Wysocki, P. D., 2003, “Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison,” Journal of Financial Economics,” Vol. 69, No. 3, 505-527.
Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., and Zhou, L. A., 2008, “Political Connections, Financing and Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Private Firms,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 87, No. 2, 283-299.
Lys, T. and Watts, R. L., 1994, “Lawsuits against Auditors,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 32, No. 3, 65-93.
Markelevich, A. and Rosner, R. L., 2013, “Auditor Fees and Fraud Firms,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1590-1625.
Menozzi, A., Urtiaga, M. G., and Vannoni, D., 2011, “Board Composition, Political Connections, and Performance in State-owned Enterprises,” Industrial and Corporate Change,” Vol. 21, No. 3, 671-698.
Niessen, A. and Ruenzi, S., 2010, “Political Connectedness and Firm Performance: Evidence from Germany,” German Economic Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, 441-464.
Schipper, K., 1989, “Commentary on Earnings Management,” Accounting Horizons, Vol. 3, No. 4, 91-102.
Sharma, V. D., Sharma, D. S., and Ananthanarayanan, U., 2011, “Client Importance and Earnings Management: The Moderating Role of Audit Committees,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice &Theory, Vol. 30, No. 3, 125-156.
Shen, C. H., Lin, C. Y., and Wang, Y. C., 2015, “Do Strong Corporate Governance Firms Still Require Political Connection, and Vice Versa?” International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 39, No. 1, 107-120.
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., 1994, “Politicians and Firms,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, No, 4, 995-1025.
Wang, T. Y., 2004, “Investment, Shareholder Monitoring and the Economics of Corporate Securities Fraud.” Working Paper, University of Maryland.
Weisbach, M. S., 1988, “Outside Directors and CEO Turnover,” Journal of financial Economics, Vol. 20, No. 3, 431-460.
Yang, Z., 2013, “Do Political Connections Add Value to Audit Firms? Evidence from IPO Audits in China,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 30, No. 3, 891-921.
Yeh, Y. H., Shu, P. G., and Chiu, S. B., 2013, “Political Connections, Corporate Governance and Preferential Bank Loans,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1079-1101.
You, J. and Du, G., 2012, “Are Political Connections a Blessing or a Curse? Evidence from CEO Turnover in China,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, 179-194.