中山管理評論

  期刊全文閱覽

中山管理評論  2015/3

第23卷第1期 跨領域質性研究特刊  p.225-267

DOI:10.6160/2015.03.06


題目
喚醒沈睡資源:《女人我最大》 背後的商業模式創新
Summoning Resources from a Deep Sleep: Business Model Innovation underlying ‘Lady First’
(635888137907187500.pdf 813KB)

作者
歐素華/東吳大學企業管理學系
Su-Hua Ou/

Department of Business Administration, Soochow University


摘要(中文)

當代企業積極學習善用外部資源以創新商業模式。但多數企業往往只看到資源的顯性價值以換取短期利益,忽略資源的隱性潛值,無法掌握創新先機。本研究剖析TVBS電視台─美妝時尚節目《女人我最大》,製作團隊如何在換取資源過程中喚醒置入資源、達人老師、與電商平台價值,從而創新營收獲利模式。本文提出三種轉型機制:喚醒有形資源的無形價值、轉化劣勢資源為優勢價值、從單一資源增生多元價值。在學理貢獻上,本研究由喚醒資源價值角度,豐富資源多元樣貌,取代開放創新對資源流動或資源交易的單一換價觀點。尤其,特殊資源加值過程,可創造資源多元應用可能性;較以往資源基礎論僅重視稀有性或難以模仿的優勢資源,將更具開創性。從資源基礎論到「資源喚價學」,乃是本研究重要貢獻。在實務上,本文建議陷入經營危機的企業,與其盲目仿效或到處籌措資源,不如潛心學習如何由「喚價」實務改變內外部資源價值。企業若能學習資源加值之道,就有能力掌握開創商模先機。

(635888137906718750.pdf 270KB)

關鍵字(中文)

商業模式創新、開放創新、價值鏈、資源交換、價值創造


摘要(英文)

Enterprises learn how to leverage outside resources to innovate their business models. However, most enterprises focus on the visible value of acquired resources but neglect the invisible potentials for innovative opportunities. This research examines how a fashion TV show, “Lady First”, can summon resources for innovation by awakening “deep sleep” resources. This paper analyzes the resource exchange process and identifies three patterns of value awakening mechanism: wakening the invisible values, turning disadvantages into advantages, and effectuating one resource for multiple functions. Theoretically, this research enriches open innovation by deepening the resource exchange process through value awakening mechanism. This thesis on resource awakening also highlights the importance of resourceful applications instead of just emphasizes on rare, valuable, not imitable, not substitutable of physical resources. Thus, extending our understanding of resource-based view theory. Practically, this article suggests that enterprises in revenue crisis need to review the incumbent resources at first for potential applications. When firms learn how to awaken “deep sleep” resources, they can create new values, summon outside resources and seize new business opportunities.

(635888137906718750.pdf 270KB)

關鍵字(英文)

business model innovation, open innovation, resource exchange, value creation, value capture


政策與管理意涵

本文探討企業組織在資源不足的劣勢下,如何有效取得外部資源以創新營 收獲利模式。本研究以TVBS 電視台《女人我最大》為案例,解析組織如何 在換取外部資源的過程中,有效喚醒內外部資源價值。此有助於創新者反思如 何跳脫資源匱乏困境,由價值創造角度,創新資源多元應用方式,從而締造豐 富營收。 在管理實務上,資源匱乏的環境才是經營常態,本研究發現對於企業組織 如何改變資源劣勢,提供重要啓發。本文提醒企業在謀取外部資源以改變匱乏 劣勢時,更應思考如何活用資源的多種應用可能性。喚醒資源的隱性價值、化 劣勢為優勢資源、由單一到多元價值應用,只是三種可能的喚價機制,未來組 織還可以發展更多資源創價機制,以活用資源,創造價值,創新商業模式。 本研究對經理人的啓示在於,千萬別低估資源的潛在價值。多數經理人員 在洽購外部資源時,往往會短視近利,斤斤計較資源的帳上利益,卻容易忽略 資源的開發潛力,從而低估資源價值,錯失創新商機。同理,經理人也不應低 估內部資源價值。許多組織容易捨近求遠,妄想取得他人資源,卻對已有珍藏 視而不見。經理人員有時欠缺的不是資源,而是創造資源價值的能力。若能不 斷檢視資源的創價流程,包括價值的創造、傳遞與擷取過程,就有機會賦予資 源全新商機。 對台灣影視音產業而言,本研究也提出重要提醒。在節目製作經費有限、 置入時間嚴苛、缺乏大牌演藝明星的現實下,《女人我最大》反而發展出達人 經紀,並以精準議題企劃,打造美妝時尚品牌定位。資源的局限性反能激發製 作團隊找到創新節目形態的可能性。因此,與其一味羨慕他人擁有豐沛資源, 不如思考如何活用有限資源,以創新戲劇節目價值,才是台灣影視音產業尋找 活路之道。 創新商業模式的本質乃是在創造資源價值。尤其,如何取得合作夥伴的策 略資源,以創新營收獲利模式,更是當前企業急務。然而,夥伴關係的建立, 並非僅繫於單純的交易關係,更在於相互抬轎的互利共生。從資源交喚的角度來看,如何增益他人資源價值,甚至反饋加值資源,以提高雙方資源流動效益, 才是建構穩定夥伴關係的根本之道。由此可知,資源交換的深層意涵,乃是在 借助他人資源,喚醒本身的創價機制,活用組織資源價值。由資源交換到資源 「喚」價,組織自覺覺人的創價能力,實為創新商業模式的根本。


參考文獻

呂珮羽,2014,偶像劇的組織作為,以三立電視台為例,東吳大學企業管理學系碩
士論文。
李金玲,2009,電視節目產製流程與知識管理研究:以八大電視頻道「娛樂百分
百」為例,世新大學廣播電視電影學研究所碩士論文。
林道燊,2011,電視媒體產業概況,初版,台北:IBT 台灣工業銀行。
陳哲彬,2010,電視節目製作關鍵流程與績效管理模式之研究,台北科技大學商業
自動化與管理研究所碩士論文。
廖宣怡,2011,中國大陸電視歌唱選秀節目產製之個案研究:以湖南衛視「超級女
聲」、「快樂男聲」為例,台灣藝術大學廣播電視學系碩士論文。
劉幼琍,2013,電訊傳播:CEO 的經營策略,初版,新北市:威仕曼文化。
劉善群,2014,串出媒體綜效:中時電子報串媒體策略與商業模式創新,國立政治
大學經營管理碩士學程學位論文。
劉麗惠,2013,劣勢隨創:資源制約下娛樂產業的創新回應,國立政治大學經營管
理碩士學程學位論文。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳蕙芬,2014,「劣勢創新:梵谷策展中的隨創行為」,中山管理
評論,22 卷 2 期:323~367。
Baden-Fuller, C. and Morgan, M. S., 2010, “Business Models as Models,” Long Range
Planning, Vol. 43, No. 2, 156-171.
Baker, T. and Nelson, R. E., 2005, “Creating Something from Nothing: Resource
Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage,” Administrative Science
Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3, 329-366.
Barney, J. B., 1991, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of
Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 99-120.
Bechky, B. A. and Okhuysen, G. A., 2011, “Expecting the Unexpected? How SWAT
Officers and Film Crews Handles Surprises,” Academy of Management Journal,
Vol. 54, No. 2, 239-261.
Berry, L. L., Shankar, V., Parish, J. T., Cadwallader, S., and Dotzel, T., 2006, “Creating
New Markets Through Service Innovation,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 47,
No. 2, 56-63.
Chesbrough, H. W., 2003, “The Era of Open Innovation,” Sloan Management Review, Vol.
44, No. 3, 35-41.
Chesbrough, H. W., 2006, Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation
Landscape, 1st, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Chesbrough, H. W., 2007, “Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models,” Sloan
Management Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, 22-36.
Chesbrough, H. W., 2010, “Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, No. 2-3, 354-363.
Chesbrough, H. W., 2011a, Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to
Grow and Compete in a New Era, 1st, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chesbrough, H. W., 2011b, “Bring Open Innovation to Services,” Sloan Management
Review, Vol. 52, No. 2, 85-90.
Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., Frost, P. J., and Lilius, J., 2006, “Explaining Compassion
Organizing,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 1, 59-96.
Eisenhardt, K. M. and Schoonhoven, C. B., 1996, “Resource-Based View of Strategic
Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms,”
Organization Science, Vol. 7, No. 2, 136-150.
Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989, “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review,” Academy of
Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 57-74.
Garud, R. and Karnøe, P., 2003, “Bricolage versus Breakthrough: Distributed and
Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship,” Research Policy, Vol. 32, No.
2, 277-300.
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A., 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory, 1st, Chicago:
Aldine.
Hisrich, R. D., 1988, “New Business Formation Through the Enterprise Development
Center: A Model for New Venture Creation,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering
Management, Vol. 35, No. 4, 221-232.
Johnson, M., Christensen, C., and Kagermann, H., 2008, “Reinventing Your Business
Model,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86, No. 12, 50-59.
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., and Satlynski, C. J., 1999, “Qualitative Research in
Organizational and Vocational Psychology: 1979-1999,” Journal of Vocational
Behavior, Vol. 55, No. 2, 161-187.
Orlikowski, W. J., 2002, “Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in
Distributed Organizing,” Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, 249-273.
Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y., 2009, Business Model Generation, 1st, Hobohen, NJ:
John Wiley and Sons.
Penrose, E. T., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 1st, New York: Wiley.
Shane, S., 2000, “Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities,”
Organization Science, Vol. 11, No. 4, 448-469.
Slywotzky, A. J., 1995, Value Migration: How to Think Several Moves Ahead of the
Competition, 1st, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A., 1990, “Firm Capabilities, Resources and the
Concept of Strategy.” Working paper, University of California at Berkeley.
Teece, D., 2010, “Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation,” Long Range
Planning, Vol. 43, No. 2-3, 172-194.
Tortoriello, M. and Krackhardt, D., 2010, “Activating Cross-Boundary Knowledge: the Role of Simmelian Ties in the Generation of Innovations,” Academy of
Management Journal, Vol. 53, No. 1, 167-181.
Wernerfelt, B., 1984, “A Resource-Based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management
Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 171-180.
Yin, R. K., 1994, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd, Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.