中山管理評論

  期刊全文閱覽

中山管理評論  2023/12

第31卷第4期  p.635-668

DOI:10.6160/SYSMR.202312_31(4).0002


題目
鮭魚返鄉:歡迎台商回流方案對企業資金成本及配置政策之影響
Salmon Run: The Effect of Welcome Back Action Plan on Corporate Capital Cost and Distribution Decision
(164_M658252f588006_Full.pdf 1,809KB)

作者
盧建霖/國立臺北大學企業管理學系
Chien-Lin Lu/

Department of of Business Administration,National Taipei University


摘要(中文)

本文探討2019年所實施台商回流方案對申請企業之稅賦、貸款條件、資產配置、以及營運績效的影響。相較於其他企業,申請企業於方案施行後擁有較低的稅賦及資金成本,促使其提升長期負債使用比例以及固定資產比例。因資金成本降低與資本支出增加同時對獲利能力產生影響,申請企業並未於方案施行後明顯增進營運績效。本文進一步探討歡迎台商回流方案對地方經濟的影響,顯示工業用地供應縣市於方案施行後提高最多0.85%的就業率。整體而言,該方案有益於申請企業降低資金成本並促進地方經濟的投資。

(164_M658252f588006_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(中文)

投資決策、資金成本、歡迎台商回台投資行動方案


摘要(英文)

This study examines the effects of “Action Plan for Welcoming Overseas Taiwanese Businesses to Return to Invest in Taiwan” (Welcome Back Action Plan) on applier’s capital cost, capital distribution, and operating performance. The results show that appliers afford fewer taxes and lower loan costs after the plan was passed in 2019. Appliers increase the proportion of fixed assets rather than those of operating capital after the fund injection. The increase in capital investment does not significantly improve applier’s firm performance by 2020 but benefits the local economy by enhancing the employment rate of land suppliers. Overall, salmon comes back with benefits to the local economy.

(164_M658252f588006_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(英文)

Cost of Capital, Capital Investment, Welcome Back Action Plan


政策與管理意涵


參考文獻

國家發展委員會,2019,「歡迎台商回台投資行動方案Q&A」,https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=5640834d13c1620dJmltdHM9MTY5NzU4NzIwMCZpZ3VpZD0zMGNlY2RmYi05ODJkLTZhYjgtMGI0OC1kY2U2OTkzNjZiMDEmaW5zaWQ9NTQzOA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=3&fclid=30cecdfb-982d-6ab8-0b48-dce699366b01&psq=%e6%ad%a1%e8%bf%8e%e5%8f%b0%e5%95%86%e5%9b%9e%e5%8f%b0%e6%8a%95%e8%b3%87%e8%a1%8c%e5%8b%95%e6%96%b9%e6%a1%88Q%26A&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly9pbnZlc3R0YWl3YW4ubmF0Lmdvdi50dy9nZXRGaWxlP2ZpbGU9YWE1MDM4NzQtZjFkNS00NTRjLTg1OTMtZGE4ZWRlYzE5Mzc3LnBkZiZGdW49QXJ0aWNsZUFjdGlvbiZsYW5nPWNodA&ntb=1, accessed on September 16, 2021.
(National Development Council, 2019, "Welcome Back Action Plan Q&A," https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=5640834d13c1620dJmltdHM9MTY5NzU4NzIwMCZpZ3VpZD0zMGNlY2RmYi05ODJkLTZhYjgtMGI0OC1kY2U2OTkzNjZiMDEmaW5zaWQ9NTQzOA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=3&fclid=30cecdfb-982d-6ab8-0b48-dce699366b01&psq=%e6%ad%a1%e8%bf%8e%e5%8f%b0%e5%95%86%e5%9b%9e%e5%8f%b0%e6%8a%95%e8%b3%87%e8%a1%8c%e5%8b%95%e6%96%b9%e6%a1%88Q%26A&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly9pbnZlc3R0YWl3YW4ubmF0Lmdvdi50dy9nZXRGaWxlP2ZpbGU9YWE1MDM4NzQtZjFkNS00NTRjLTg1OTMtZGE4ZWRlYzE5Mzc3LnBkZiZGdW49QXJ0aWNsZUFjdGlvbiZsYW5nPWNodA&ntb=1, accessed on September 16, 2021.)
國家發展委員會,2019,「歡迎台商回台投資行動方案(核定本)」,https://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwji9bOcqYGCAxXjk1YBHZrrCGIQFnoECAkQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tax.ntpc.gov.tw%2Fdl-4239-a7e3f7e03e7f4c718dac57c2436c0edd.html&usg=AOvVaw2TqyISMuk5zKIm751vGWqW&opi=89978449, accessed on September 16, 2021.
(National Development Council, 2019, “Welcome Back Action Plan,” https://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwji9bOcqYGCAxXjk1YBHZrrCGIQFnoECAkQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tax.ntpc.gov.tw%2Fdl-4239-a7e3f7e03e7f4c718dac57c2436c0edd.html&usg=AOvVaw2TqyISMuk5zKIm751vGWqW&opi=89978449, accessed on September 16, 2021.)
資誠聯合會計師事務所,2019,「境外資金回台–策略思維及實務運作」,https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-tax/assets/new-fund-repatriation-tax-rules.pdf, accessed on September 16, 2021.
(PricewaterhouseCoopers Taiwan, 2019, “Repatriate foreign fund – Strategical and practical issues,”
https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-tax/assets/new-fund-repatriation-tax-rules.pdf, accessed on September 16, 2021.)
經濟部,2021,「沒開玩笑!「投資臺灣三大方案」愚人節突破1.2兆。」,https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=40&news_id=93745, accessed on September 16, 2021.
(Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2021, “It is not a joke! Invest in Taiwan Action Plan has received funds over 1.2 trillion on April Fool's Day,” https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=40&news_id=93745, accessed on September 16, 2021.)
Acharya, V. and Naqvi, H., 2012, “The seeds of a crisis: A theory of bank liquidity and risk-taking over the business cycle,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 106, No. 2, 349–366.
Atwood, T. J., Downes, J., Henley, J. and Mathis, M., 2020, “The Impact of U.S. Tax Reform on U.S. Firm Acquisitions of Domestic and Foreign Targets,” Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3600978.
Booth, J. R. and Booth, L. C., 2006, “Loan collateral decisions and corporate borrowing costs,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 38, No. 1, 67–90.
Dell’Ariccia, G. and Marquez, R., 2006, “Lending booms and lending standards,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 61, No. 5, 2511–2546.
Kopp, E., Leigh, D., Mursula, S. and Tambunlertchai, S., 2019, “U.S. investment since the tax cuts and jobs act of 2017.” Working Paper No. 2019/120, International Monetary Fund.
Ruckes, M., 2004, “Bank competition and credit standards,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1073–1102.
Simone, L. D., Piotroski, J. D. and Tomy, R. E., 2019, “Repatriation taxes and foreign cash holdings: The impact of anticipated tax reform,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 32, No. 8, 3105–3143.