本研究以動態視角檢視創業連結者於創業生態圈中的動態建構與治理歷程，選擇科技部之臺灣科技新創基地（Taiwan Tech Arena, TTA）為研究對象，檢視TTA於創業生態圈的創業連結者角色，透過Goswami等人（2018）創業生態圈關鍵行動者與Isenberg（2010, 2011）創業生態圈類別功能，檢視TTA場域於2018年6月至2021年4月期間之317場活動，分析每場次關鍵行動者與類別功能。本研究發現創業連結者於創業生態圈的建構與治理是動態累積歷程，包括制度建構、能力培育和網絡媒合三個階段。本研究認為創業生態圈的建構是生態圈系統失靈與關鍵行動者/類別功能介入的治理歷程，TTA在不同階段依序連結所需之關鍵行動者與類別功能，解決創業生態圈中制度、能力與網絡失靈；本研究最後提出理論貢獻與實務意涵。

(178_M692cf110626ec_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

This study explores how the entrepreneurial connector, known as “Taiwan Tech Arena, TTA”, shapes and manages the entrepreneurial ecosystem through the lens of an entrepreneurial dynamic view. To accomplish this research purpose, we develop an analytical framework that combines six key entrepreneurial actors as suggested by Goswami et al (2018), and six types of entrepreneurial elements proposed by Isenberg (2010, 2011). This qualitative analysis was centered on 317 entrepreneurial activities in TTA spanning from June 2018 to April 2021. We examine the process of entrepreneurial dynamic evolution and entrepreneurial governance of within the context of TTA entrepreneurial activities, utilizing the aforementioned analytical framework. The results reveal that TTA, as the entrepreneurial connector, manages the entrepreneurial ecosystem in Taiwan through three distinct process stages: (1) the institutional building stage, (2) the capability cultivating stage, and (3) the network connecting stage. In summary, we conclude that while the role of entrepreneurial connector varies across three different process stages, TTA engages with diverse key entrepreneurial actors and types of entrepreneurial elements to address various types of entrepreneurial ecosystem system failures, including institutional, capability, and network failures. Finally, we provide theoretical contributions and managerial implications related to the entrepreneurial ecosystem in the study.

(178_M692cf110626ec_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

科技部。（2018）。109年度青年科技創新創業基地建置計畫期末執行成果報告書。中華民國行政院（未公開資料）。 Ministry of Science and Technology. (2018). Final Execution Outcome Report of the 2020 Youth Technology Innovation Entrepreneurship Base Establishment Project. Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Unpublished report). 陳鈺淳、陳旻男、潘冠穎（2022）。同中求異：創業支持組織善用與新創團隊之關係。組織與管理，15（2），113-159。 https://doi.org/10.53106/199687602022081502003 Chen, Y. C., Chen, M. N., & Pan, K. Y. (2022). Similar but Different: Entrepreneurship Support Organizations Leverage the Relationship with Startups. Journal of Organization and Management, 15(2), 113-159. https://doi.org/10.53106/199687602022081502003 Acs, Z., Åstebro, T., Audretsch, D., & Robinson, D. T. (2016). Public policy to promote entrepreneurship: A call to arms. Small Business Economics, 47(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9712-2 Adams, S. B. (2021). From orchards to chips: Silicon Valley's evolving entrepreneurial ecosystem. Entrepreneurship Regional Development, 33(1-2), 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2020.1734259 Adner, R., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (2013). Introduction: Collaboration and competition in business ecosystems. In R. Adner, J. E. Oxley, & B. S. Silverman (Eds.), Collaboration and competition in business ecosystems (Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 30, pp. ix-xvii). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-3322(2013)30 Alaassar, A., Mention, A. L., & Aas, T. H. (2022). Ecosystem dynamics: Exploring the interplay within fintech entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 2157-2182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00505-5 Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887-903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694 Ariño, A., & de la Torre, J. (1998). Learning from failure: Towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures. Organization Science, 9(3), 306-325. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.306 Auerswald, P. E., & Dani, L. (2017). The adaptive life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The biotechnology cluster. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9869-3 Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266 Bergman, B. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2022). Helping entrepreneurs help themselves: A review and relational research agenda on entrepreneurial support organizations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 688-728. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211028736 Bermiss, Y. S., Hallen, B. L., McDonald, R., & Pahnke, E. C. (2017). Entrepreneurial beacons: The Yale endowment, run-ups, and the growth of venture capital. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 545-565. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2508 Bhswe, N., & Zahra, S. A. (2019). Inducing heterogeneity in local entrepreneurial ecosystems: The role of MNEs. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9954-7 Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: A critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7 Cantner, U., Cunningham, J. A., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A dynamic lifecycle model. Small Business Economics, 57(1), 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00316-0 Cao, Z., & Shi, X. (2021). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial ecosystem in advanced and emerging economies. Small Business Economics, 57(1), 75-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00326-y Carlsson, B., & Jacobsson, S. (1997). In search of useful public policies: Key lessons and issues for policy makers. In B. Carlsson (Ed.), Technological systems and industrial dynamics (pp. 299-315). Springer Link. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6133-0_11 Cheah, S., Ho, Y. P., & Lim, P. (2016). Role of public science in fostering the innovation and startup ecosystem in Singapore. Asian Research Policy, 7(1), 78-93. https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/156633 Cho, D. S., Ryan, P., & Buciuni, G. (2022). Evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems: A research pathway. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 1865-1883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00487-4 Chua, H. C. M. (2019). Survival by technopreneurialism: Innovation, imaginaries and the new narrative of nationhood in Singapore. Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721819873202 Cloutier, L., & Messeghem, K. (2022). Whirlwind model of entrepreneurial ecosystem path dependence. Small Business Economics, 59(2), 611-625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00553-x Cohen, S. L., Bingham, C. B., & Hallen, B. L. (2019). The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4), 810-854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218782131 Colombelli, A., Paolucci, E., & Ughetto, E. (2019). Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 505-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9957-4 Colombo, M. G., Dagnino, G. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Salmador, M. (2019). The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 419-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9952-9 Cumming, D., Werth, J. C., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Governance in entrepreneurial ecosystems: Venture capitalists vs. technology parks. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 455-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9955-6 Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Wirsching, K. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystem governance: A principal investigator-centered governance framework. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9959-2 Dacin, M. T., Munir, K., & Tracey, P. (2010). Formal dining at Cambridge Colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1393-1418. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318388 Doblinger, C., Surana, K., & Anadon, L. D. (2019). Governments as partners: The role of alliances in US cleantech startup innovation. Research Policy, 48(6), 1458-1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.006 Dutt, N., Hawn, O., Vidal, E., Chatterji, A., McGahan, A., & Mitchell, W. (2016). How open system intermediaries address institutional failures: The case of business incubators in emerging-market countries. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 818-840. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0463 Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 Fisher, G., Kuratko, D. F., Bloodgood, J. M., & Hornsby, J. S. (2017). Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.005 Gerring, J. (2001). Social science methodology: A criterial framework. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815492 Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151 Giudici, A., Reinmoeller, P., & Ravasi, D. (2018). Open-system orchestration as a relational source of sensing capabilities: Evidence from a venture association. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1369-1402. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0573 Goswami, K., Mitchell, J. R., & Bhagavatula, S. (2018). Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 117-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1281 Hederer, C. (2018). Political entrepreneurship and institutional change: An evolutionary perspective. International Journal of Public Policy, 6(1/2), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2010.031208 Huang, L., & Knight, A. P. (2017). Resources and relationships in entrepreneurship: An exchange theory of the development and effects of the entrepreneur-investor relationship. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 80-102. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0397 Isenberg, D. (2010). The big idea: How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50. https://hbr.org/2010/06/the-big-idea-how-to-start-an-entrepreneurial-revolution Isenberg, D. (2011, May 11). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economy policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. The Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, Babson Global. Kantis, H., Gonzalo, M., Federico, J., & Garcia, S. I. (2020). Entrepreneurial ecosystems meet innovation systems: Building bridges from Latin America to the global south. In A. Tsvetkova, J. Schmutzler, & R. Pugh (Eds.), Entrepreneurial ecosystems meet innovation systems: Synergies, policy lessons, and overlooked dimensions (pp. 41-60). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901184.00013 Kimjeon, J., & Davidsson, P. (2022). External enablers of entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for accumulation of strategically actionable knowledge. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 46(3), 643-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211010673 Kivimaa, P. (2014). Government-affiliated intermediary organizations as actors in system-level transitions. Research Policy, 43(8), 1370-1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.007 Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), 1062-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006 Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 Lee, S. Y., Noh, M., & Seul, J. Y. (2017). Government-led regional innovation: A case of "Pangyo" IT cluster of South Korea. European Planning Studies, 25(5), 848-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1282084 Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/naturalistic-inquiry/book842 Locke, K. D. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/grounded-theory-in-management-research/book209772 Mack, E., & Mayer, H. (2016). The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118-2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586547 Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to the OECD, 30, 77-102. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf Mathias, B. D., Huyghe, A., & Williams, D. W. (2020). Selling your soul to the devil? The importance of independent ownership to identity distinctiveness for oppositional categories. Strategic Management Journal, 41(13), 2548-2584. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3180 Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649-667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86. https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition Motoyama, Y., & Knowlton, K. (2016). From resource munificence to ecosystem integration: The case of government sponsorship in St. Louis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(5-6), 448-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1186749 Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ self-regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1071-1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00519.x Nordic Innovation. (2023). Nordic Innovation annual report 2022. Nordic Council of Ministers. https://www.nordicinnovation.org/2023/annual-report-2022 O'Connor, A., & Audretsch, D. (2023). Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems: Learning from forest ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 60, 1051-1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00623-8 Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50-51, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003 Rampersad, G. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A governance perspective. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 7(3), 1122-1134. Retrieved from http://www.scitecresearch.com/journals/index.php/jrbem/article/view/932 Reypens, C., Lievens, A., & Blazevic, V. (2021). Hybrid orchestration in multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Practices of mobilizing multiple, diverse stakeholders across organizational boundaries. Organization Studies, 42(1), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619868268 Ryan, P., Giblin, M., Andersson, U., & Clancy, J. (2018). Subsidiary knowledge creation in co-evolving contexts. International Business Review, 27(5), 915-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.003 Siaw, C. A., & Sarpong, D. (2021). Dynamic exchange capabilities for value co-creation in ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 134, 493-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.060 Silander, D. (2016). The political entrepreneur. In C. Karlsson, C. Silander, & D. Silander (Eds.), Political entrepreneurship: Regional growth and entrepreneurial diversity in Sweden (pp. 7-20). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785363504.00007 Smith, K. (2000). Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: Rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 73-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/146324400363536 Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167 Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268 Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 StartupBlink. (2022). Taiwan startup ecosystem report 2022. https://lp.startupblink.com/taiwan-report/ StartupBlink. (2023). The global startup ecosystem index report 2023. http://www.startupblink.com/startupecosystemreport Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 49(8), 1395-1401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x Thompson, T. A., Purdy, J. M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2018). How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1285 Van de Ven, H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90028-4 Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1990). Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program. Organization Science, 1(3), 313-335. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.313 van Rijnsoever, F. J. (2020). Meeting, mating, and intermediating: How incubators can overcome weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 49(1), 103884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103884 van Rijnsoever, F. J. (2022). Intermediaries for the greater good: How entrepreneurial support organizations can embed constrained sustainable development startups in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 51(2), 104438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104438 Wade, R. H. (2018). The developmental state: Dead or alive? Development and Change, 49(2), 518-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12381 Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., & Kale, D. (2015). National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature. Research Policy, 44(8), 1407-1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.004 Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive failures framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015 Wei, Y. (2022). Regional governments and opportunity entrepreneurship in underdeveloped institutional environments: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective. Research Policy, 51(1), 104380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104380 Weissert, C. S. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs, policy opportunists, and legislative effectiveness. American Politics Quarterly, 19(2), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9101900207 Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25(6), 609-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002 Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150#resources Yoon, H., Yun, S., Lee, J., & Phillips, F. (2015). Entrepreneurship in East Asian regional innovation systems: Role of social capital. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100, 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.028 Younger, S., & Fisher, G. (2020). The exemplar enigma: New venture image formation in an emergent organizational category. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1), 105897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.09.002