中山管理評論

  期刊全文閱覽

中山管理評論  2022/12

第30卷第5期  p.857-897

DOI:10.6160/SYSMR.202212_30(5).0003


題目
與機器共舞:以交織理論探索人機協作的能動性
Dancing with Machines: Exploring Collective Agency of Human-Machine Collaborations from an Assemblage Perspective
(159_M63a550aa70e19_Full.pdf 1,495KB)

作者
周信輝、方世杰、李慶芳、蔡馥陞、劉亭蘭/國立成功大學企業管理學系、國立成功大學企業管理學系、實踐大學國際貿易學系、正修科技大學企業管理系、國立成功大學企業管理學系
Hsin-Hui Chou,Shih-Chieh Fang,Ching-Fang Lee,Fu-Sheng Tsai,Ting-Lan Liu/

Hsin-Hui Chou, Shih-Chieh Fang, Ching-Fang Lee, Fu-Sheng Tsai, Ting-Lan Liu/ Department of Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University; Department of Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University; Department of International Trade, Shih Chien University; Department of Business Administration, Cheng Shiu University; Department of Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University


摘要(中文)

人類如何與機器互動與協作,進而共同創造價值,已成數位經濟裡的關鍵實務課題。特別是,機器如何在特定的情境脈絡中產生與人協作的「能動性」,這是值得組織學者關切的議題。本研究採用交織理論觀點探討:於人機協作之中,機器如何產生能動性?本研究以多重個案進行質性探究,從三個不同情境案例中來探究機器於特定互動脈絡之協作模式。本文獲致兩項發現。第一,由人與非人行動者所構築的交織體定義了行動者的三種角色,這是機器於人機協作中產生能動性的關鍵。第二,本研究發現元素的物質角色與表達角色之間的相互作用,其過程動態影響著人與機器的能動性之發展,進而促進或限制人機協作之運作。本研究進一步據此發展理論與實務意涵。

(159_M63a550aa70e19_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(中文)

人機協作、能動性、集體能動性、交織觀點、價值共創


摘要(英文)

Driven by digital transformation and industrial 4.0, how humans are engaged in collaborations with machines, through which value is co-created, has become a pivotal managerial issue. Particularly, how a machine generates its capacity to collaborate with humans, namely collective agency of human-machine collaboration, in a specific context has drawn increased attention from organization scholars. Towards this, we adopt an assemblage perspective to investigate this research question: how does a machine produce its agency in the human-machine collaboration? By this we attempt to deepen the knowledge of value co-creation in human-machine collaboration contexts. We conducted empirical investigation through a multiple-case study characterized by three different and unique contexts, in which the roles of machines in different interaction patterns were explored. From an assemblage perspective, we have gained two findings. First, we uncover three roles of actors in human-non-human assemblages, namely partners, assistants, and learners, by which the agency of machines in their collaborations with humans is generated. Second, we find that the interplay between the material and expressive roles of actors not only affects the generation of agency but also drives the territorialization and de-territorialization of assemblages, paradoxically enabling and constraining human-machine collaborations. These findings allow us to develop theoretical and managerial implications.

(159_M63a550aa70e19_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(英文)

Human-Machine Collaboration, Agency, Collective Agency, Assemblage


政策與管理意涵


參考文獻

Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T., and Pinkse, J., 2017, “Promises and Paradoxes of the Sharing Economy: An Organizing Framework,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 125, No. Special Section, 1-10.
Barad, K., 2003, “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 28, No. 3, 801-831.
Barad, K., 2007, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, 1st, Duke University Press: Durham.
Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J., and Vargo, S. L., 2015, “Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 1, 135-154.
Bauer, A., Wollherr, D., and Buss, M., 2008, “Human-robot Collaboration: A Survey,” International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, Vol. 5, No. 1, 47-66.
Belk, R., 2014, “You Are What You Can Access: Sharing and Collaborative Consumption Online,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 67, No. 8, 1595-1600.
Bennett, J., 2010, Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, 1st, Durham: Duke University Press.
Bleicher, J., 1980, Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy and Critique, 1st, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Boeije, H. R., 2010, Analysis in Qualitative Research, 1st, Los Angeles: Sage.
Callon, M., 1999, “Actor-network Theory—The Market Test,” The Sociological Review, Vol. 47, No.1, 181-195.
Canniford, R. and Bajde, D., 2016, Assembling Consumption: Researching Actors, Networks and Markets, 1st, New York: Routledge.
Cleaver, F., 2007, “Understanding Agency in Collective Action,” Journal of Human Development, Vol. 8, No. 2, 223-244.
Crotty, M., 1998, The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process, 1st, England, United Kingdom: Sage.
Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., and Bressgott, T., 2020, “How Artificial Intelligence Will Change the Future of Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 48, 23-42.
DeLanda, M., 2006, A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity, 1st, London: Continuum.
DeLanda, M., 2016, Assemblage Theory, 1st, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F., 1987, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, 1st, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dreyfus, H. L. and Rabinow, P., 1983, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 1st, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Du, P. and Chou, H.-H., 2020, “Sociomaterial Practices for Value Co-creation in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from Xbed's Access-based Accommodation Service,” Information Technology & People, Vol. 33, No. 3, 963-982.
Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.-E., 2002, “Systematic Combining: An Abductive Approach to Case Research,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55, No. 7, 553-560.
Dyer, W. G. and Wilkins, A. L., 1991, “Better Stories, not Better Constructs, to Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.16, No. 3, 613-619.
Epp, A. M. and Price, L. L., 2010, “The Storied Life of Singularized Objects: Forces of Agency and Network Transformation,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36, No. 5, 820-837.
Fuchs, S., 2001, “Beyond Agency,” Sociological Theory, Vol. 19, No. 1, 24-40.
Giddens, A., 1979, Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis, 1st, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Giddens, A., 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, 1st, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., and Zaheer, A., 2000, “Strategic Networks,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, 203-215.
Hainz, T., Bossert, S., and Strech, D., 2016, “Collective Agency and the Concept of ‘Public’ in Public Involvement: A Practice-oriented Analysis,” BMC Medical Ethics, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1-14.
Herriott, R. E. and Firestone, W. A., 1983, “Multisite Qualitative Policy Research: Optimizing Description and Generalizability,” Educational Researcher, Vol. 12, No. 2, 14-19.
Hoc, J.-M., 2000, “From Human-machine Interaction to Human-machine Cooperation,” Ergonomics, Vol. 43, No. 7, 833-843.
Hoffman, D. L. and Novak, T. P., 2018, “Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 44, No. 6, 1178-1204.
Huang, M.-H. and Rust, R. T., 2020, “Engaged to a Robot? The Role of AI in Service,” Journal of Service Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, 30-41.
Huang, M.-H., and Rust, R. T., 2021, “A Strategic Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 49, 30-50.
Huang, M.-H. and Rust, R. T., 2022, “A Framework for Collaborative Artificial Intelligence in Marketing,” Journal of Retailing, Vol. 98, No. 2, 209-223.
Jacobides, M. G., 2019, “In the Ecosystem Economy, What's Your Strategy?,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 97, No. 5, 128-137.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., and Gawer, A., 2018, “Towards a Theory of Ecosystems,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2255-2276.
Kretschmer, T., Leiponen, A., Schilling, M., and Vasudeva, G., 2022, “Platform Ecosystems as Meta-organizations: Implications for Platform Strategies,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3, 405-424.
Leonardi, P. M., 2011, “When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, 147-167.
Leonardi, P. M., 2013, “Theoretical Foundations for the Study of Sociomateriality,” Information and Organization, Vol. 23, No. 2, 59-76.
Leone, D., Schiavone, F., Appio, F. P., and Chiao, B., 2021, “How does Artificial Intelligence Enable and Enhance Value Co-creation in Industrial Markets? An Exploratory Case Study in the Healthcare Ecosystem,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 129, 849- 859.
Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G., 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry, 1st, Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
Müller, M. and Schurr, C., 2016, “Assemblage Thinking and Actor-network Theory: Conjunctions, Disjunctions, Cross-fertilisations,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol. 41, No. 3, 217-229.
McGowran, P. and Donovan, A., 2021, “Assemblage Theory and Disaster Risk Management,” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 45, No. 6, 1601-1624.
McLeay, F., Osburg, V. S., and Yoganathan, V., 2021, “Replaced by a Robot: Service Implications in the Age of the Machine,” Journal of Service Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, 104-121.
Mele, C., Nenonen, S., Pels, J., Storbacka, K., Nariswari, A., and Kaartemo, V., 2018, “Shaping Service Ecosystems: Exploring the Dark Side of Agency,” Journal of Service Management, Vol. 29, No. 4, 521-545.
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M., 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd, London: SAGE.
Myers, M. D., 2009, Qualitative Research in Business and Management, 1st, Los Angeles: Sage.
Nail, T., 2017, “What is an Assemblage?” SubStance, Vol. 46, No. 1, 21-37.
Newcomb, D., 2011, The Sociology of Wholeness: Emile Durkheim and Carl Jung, 1st, London: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Noble, S. M., Mende, M., Grewal, D., and Parasuraman, A., 2022, “The Fifth Industrial Revolution: How Harmonious Human–Machine Collaboration is Triggering a Retail and Service [R]evolution,” Journal of Retailing, Vol. 98, No. 2, 199-208.
Orlikowski, W. J., 2010, “The Sociomateriality of Organisational Life: Considering Technology in Management Research,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 125-141.
Patton, M. Q., 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd, London: SAGE.
Pelenc, J., Bazile, D., and Ceruti, C., 2015, “Collective Capability and Collective Agency for Sustainability: A Case Study,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 118, 226-239.
Ramaswamy, V. and Ozcan, K., 2018a, “Offerings as Digitalized Interactive Platforms: A Conceptual Framework and Implications,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 82, No. 4, 19-31.
Ramaswamy, V. and Ozcan, K., 2018b, “What is Co-creation? An Interactional Creation Framework and Its Implications for Value Creation,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 84, 196-205.
Savat, D., 2013, Uncoding the Digital: Technology, Subjectivity and Action in the Control Society, 1st, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Seeber, I., Bittner, E., Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, T., de Vreede, G.-J., Elkins, A., Maier, R., Merz, A. B., Oeste-Reiße, S., Randrup, N., Schwabe, G., and Söllner, M., 2020, “Machines as Teammates: A research Agenda on AI in Team Collaboration,” Information & Management, Vol. 57, No. 2, 1-22.
Sen, A., 1999, Development as Freedom, 1st, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sewell, W. H., Jr., 1992, “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 98, No. 1, 1-29.
Storbacka, K., Brodie, R. J., Böhmann, T., Maglio, P. P., and Nenonen, S., 2016, “Actor Engagement as a Microfoundation for Value Co-creation,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, No. 8, 3008-3017.
Tsarouchi, P., Makris, S., and Chryssolouris, G., 2016, “Human–robot Interaction Review and Challenges on Task Planning and Programming,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 29, No. 8, 916-931.
Van de Putte, I., De Schauwer, E., Van Hove, G., and Davies, B., 2018, “Rethinking Agency as an Assemblage from Change Management to Collaborative Work,” International Journal of Inclusive Education, Vol. 22, No. 8, 885-901.
Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F., 2016, “Institutions and Axioms: An Extension and Update of Service-dominant Logic,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 44, 5-23.
Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F., 2017, “Service-dominant Logic 2025,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 34, No. 1, 46-67.
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., and Akaka, M. A., 2008, “On Value and Value Co-creation: A Service Systems and Service Logic Perspective,” European Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, 145-152.
Wilson, H. J. and Daugherty, P. R., 2018, “Collaborative Intelligence: Humans and AI Are Joining Forces,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 96, No. 4, 114-123.
Yin, R. K., 2014, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th, Los Angeles: Sage.