中山管理評論

  期刊全文閱覽

中山管理評論  2021/9

第29卷第3期  p.383-416

DOI:10.6160/SYSMR.202109_29(3).0001


題目
地方價值開創與創生場的激發:大學資本之運用
Provoking Local Value and Regional Revitalizing Field: the Application of University’s Capital
(152_M615163098e326_Full.pdf 586KB)

作者
蔡敦浩、吳孟珍、吳亦昕、李至昱/國立中山大學企業管理學系、國立中山大學企業管理學系、國立中山大學社會創新研究所、好孕行生醫股份有限公司
Dun-Hou Tsai, Meng-Chen Wu, Yi-Shin Wu, Chih-Yu Lee/

Department of Business Administration, National Sun Yat-sen University; Department of Business Administration, National Sun Yat-sen University; Institute of Social Innovation, National Sun Yat-sen University; iPreg Inc.


摘要(中文)

本研究以國立中山大學在高雄市前鎮草衙社區的社會實踐的歷程,探討社區轉變為地方創生場域的要素,提出激發創生場域的三個關鍵:地方價值的浮現與傳遞、網絡關係的建構與信任,以及社區夥伴在參與過程中產生的學習與認同。 其次,本研究發現大學具備特殊文化、社會、經濟與象徵資本,能在場域中扮演連結夥伴、挖掘地方價值、舉辦活動聚合社區成員的跨疆界角色,讓社區成員在合作中獲得開創學習與模仿創新的機會,對彼此產生承諾與認同感,有助地方創生場域的激發。 在社會實踐過程中,大學團隊不僅是研究者/觀察者,更是親身經歷社區開創歷程的內部實踐者/開創者。因此,本研究也提出以創制研究方法探究大學在社會實踐的動態開創歷程與內部人觀點。

(152_M615163098e326_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(中文)

社會實踐、Bourdieu 場域理論、文化資本、創制研究法


摘要(英文)

This study recorded and analyzed the social practice process of the Sun Yat-Sen University team in the Caoya community in Cianjhen, Kaohsiung City, and explored the elements of the community’s transformation into a regional revitalizing field. There are three keys to the stimulation of this transformation: the emergence and transmission of local values, the construction of networks and relationships, and the learning and recognition generated by community partners in the process of participation. Furthermore, this research found that university teams have a unique cultural, social, economic, and symbolic capital. As a result, they can play the cross-border role of connecting partners—developing local value and organizing activities to gather community members in the field. This research also reflected on the complex role of university teams in the social practice process, as they simultaneously play the researcher/observer and practitioner/innovator roles in the field. Therefore, this research also introduced an enactive research method to explore insider views during the social practice process.

(152_M615163098e326_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(英文)

Social Practice, Bourdieu’s Field Theory, Cultural Capital, Enactive Research


政策與管理意涵


參考文獻

邱天助,2002,布爾迪厄文化再製理論,台北:桂冠。(Chiou, T. J., 2004, “Bourdieu’s Theory of Reproduction in Culture”, 1st, Taipei: Laureate)
施進忠,2010,「突破與前瞻:創業學人群像側寫專題系列二。開創創業研究視野—先行者 Christ Steyaert 介紹」,創業管理研究,5 卷 2 期,107~124。(Shih, C. C., 2010, “Breakthrough and Foresight: Select Profiles of Entrepreneurial Scholars. Preface: The Pioneer Research in Entreprenuring Research-Christ Steyaert,” Entrepreneurial Management Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, 107-124.)
陳信宏譯,Saunders, D. 著,2011,落腳城市:最終的人口大遷徙與世界的未來,台北: 麥田。(Saunders, D., 2010, Arrival City:The Final Migration and Our Next World.)
陳碧祥,2000,「詞條名稱:詮釋螺旋」,
https://pedia.cloud.edu.tw/Entry/Detail/?title=%E8%A9%AE%E9%87%8B%E8%9E%BA%E6%97%8B, accessed on July, 20, 2020。(Chen, B. C., 2020, "Term Name: Interpretation Spiral,” https://pedia.cloud.edu.tw/Entry/Detail/?title=%E8%A9%AE%E9%87%8B%E8%9E
%BA%E6%97%8B, accessed on July, 20, 2020.)
新作坊,2018,「計畫緣起與作法」,https://hisp.ntu.edu.tw/about, accessed on December 12, 2020。(Humanity Innovation and Social Practice, 2018, “The Origin and Practice of the Plan,” https://hisp.ntu.edu.tw/about, accessed on December 12, 2020.)
楊弘任,2018,「何謂在地性?從地方知識與在地範疇出發」, https://eyesonplace.net/2018/06/15/8259/?doing_wp_cron=1628662593.30978488922 11914062500, accessed on December 12, 2020。(Yang, H. J., 2018, “What is Locality? Starting from Local Knowledge and Indigenous Category,” https://eyesonplace.net/2018/06/15/8259/?doing_wp_cron=1628662593.309784889221 1914062500, accessed on December 12, 2020.)
楊茜評,2009,「Bourdieu 的文化再製意涵與其在學校教育上的啟示」,北縣教育期刊, 66 期:44~48。(Yang, C. P., 2009, “The Implication of Bourdieu's Cultural Reproduction and its Enlightenment in School Education,” Taipei County Education, Vol. 66, 44-48.)
蔡敦浩、劉育忠,2010,「突破與前瞻: 創業學人群像側寫專題序言。突破傳統創業研究的視角:創業學人的前瞻見解與洞見開採」,創業管理研究,5 卷 1 期,121~124。(Tsai, D. H. and Liu, Y. C., 2010, “Breakthrough and Foresight: Select Profiles of Entrepreneurial Scholars. Preface: The Perspective of Traditional Entrepreneurship Research: Prospects and Insights of Entrepreneur Scholars,” Entrepreneurial Management Research, Vol.5, No. 1, 121-124.)
Baker, T. and Powell, E. E., 2019, “Entrepreneurship as a New Liberal Art,” Small Business Economics, Vol. 52, No. 2, 405-418.
Berglund, K. and Johansson, A. W., 2007, “Constructions of Entrepreneurship: A Discourse Analysis of Academic Publications,” Journal of Enterprising Communities, Vol. 1, No. 1, 77-102.
Berglund, K. and Johansson, A. W., 2007, “Entrepreneurship and Conscientization in Processes of Regional Development,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 19, No. 6, 499-525.
Berglund, K., Johannisson, B., 2012, “Introduction: in the Beginning was Societal Entrepreneurship,” in Berglund, K., Johannisson, B. and Schwartz, B., (eds.) Societal Entrepreneurship: Positioning, Penetrating, Promoting, First Edition, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1-27.
Bourdieu, P., 1977, Outline of a Theory of Practice, 1st, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fletcher, D. E., 2011, “A curiosity for Contexts: Entrepreneurship, Enactive Research and Autoethnography,” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 23, No. 1-2, 65-76.
Garcia-Lorenzo, L., Donnelly, P. and Sell-Trujillo, L., 2017, “Liminal Entrepreneuring: The Creative Practices of Nascent Necessity Entrepreneurs,” Organization Studies, Vol. 39, No. 2-3, 373-395.
Gartner, W. B., 2007, “Entrepreneurial Narrative and a Science of the Imagination,” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 22, No. 5, 613-627.
Giuffré, L. and Ratto, S. E., 2014, “A New Paradigm in Higher Education: University Social Responsibility (USR),” Journal of Education & Human Development, Vol.3, No. 1, 231-238.
Hjorth, D., 2004, “Towards Genealogic Storytelling: Relating Discursive and Narrative Approaches in Entrepreneurship Studies”, in Hjorth, D. and Steyaert, C. (eds.) Narrative and Discursive Approaches in Entrepreneurship Studies, First Edition, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 210-229.
Hjorth, D., 2007, “Narrating the Entrepreneurial Event: Learning from Shakespeare’s Iago,”
Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 22, No. 5, 712-732.
Johannisson, B., 2011, “Toward a Practice Theory of Entrepreneuring,” Small Business Economics, Vol. 36. 135-150.
Johannisson, B., 2018, “Disclosing Everyday Practices Constituting Social Entrepreneuring –a Case of Necessity Effectuation,” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 30, No. 3-4, 390-406.
Johannisson, B. 2007., “Enacting Local Economic Development-Theoretical and Methodological Challenges,” Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. 1, 7-26.
Johansson, A. W., 2004, “Narrating the Entrepreneur,” International Small Business Journal, Vol 22, No3, 273-293.
Johnstone, H. and Lionais, D., 2004, “Depleted Communities and Community Business Entrepreneurship: Revaluing Space through Place,” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 16, No. 3, 217-233.
Mankowski, E. and Rappaport, J., 1995, “Stories, Identity, and the Psychological Sense of Community”, in R. S. Wyer, Jr. (ed.), Knowledge and Memory: The Real story, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 211-226.
Poldner, K., Branzei, O., and Steyaert, C., 2018, “Fashioning Ethical Subjectivity: The Embodied Ethics of Entrepreneurial Self-Formation,” Organization, Vol. 26, No. 2, 151-174.
Rindova, V., Barry D., and Ketchen, D. J., 2009, “Entrepreneuring as Emancipation,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34, No. 3, 477-491.
Sarasvathy, S. D., 2001, “Causation and Effectuation: Toward A Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, 243-263.
Savage, M., 2021, “Bourdieu Comes to Town: Part II,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, forthcoming.
Shane, S. A., 1997, “Who is Publishing the Entrepreneurship Research?” Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, 83-95.
Skoglund, A. and Berglund, K., 2018, “Entrepreneurship and the Entrepreneurial Self: Creating Alternatives through Entrepreneurship Education?” in Berglund, K., and Verduyn, K. (eds.) Revitalizing Entrepreneurship Education: Adopting a critical approach in the classroom, First Edition, London: Routledge.
Steyaert, C., 2007, “Entrepreneuring as a Conceptual Attractor? A Review of Process Theories in 20 Years of Entrepreneurship Studies,” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 19, No. 6, 453-477.
Vasilescu, R., Barna, C., Epure, M., and Baicu, C., 2010, “Developing University Social Responsibility: A Model for the Challenges of the New Civil Society,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 2, 4177-4182.
Wacquant, L., T. Slater and Pereira V.B., 2014, “Territorial Stigmatization in Action,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, Vol. 46, No. 6, 1270-1280.