中山管理評論

  期刊全文閱覽

中山管理評論  2016/6

第24卷第2期  p.245-289

DOI:10.6160/2016.06.01


題目
特權消費有關係嗎?大陸銀行的實證研究
Do Perks Matter? Evidence from Chinese Banks
(121_M577fb28c2b384_Full.pdf 797KB)

作者
丁秀儀/國立臺北科技大學資訊與財金管理系
Hsiu-I Ting/

Department of Information and Finance Management, National Taipei University of Technology


摘要(中文)

此文探討大陸銀行為何特權消費高,特權消費與銀行績效間有何關聯,以及甚麼機制可有效監督特權消費。研究結果顯示CEO權力大,CEO有政治關聯,大銀行,老銀行的特權消費比較高。雖然我們沒發現特權消費與職位鞏固之間有明顯的關聯,但特權消費高的銀行績效較差,且特權消費與績效間的關係在特別強調地位的銀行(如大銀行,CEO權力大的銀行)中更明顯。特權消費高的銀行風險承擔程度也比較高,這樣的銀行比較會從事績效波動高的相關活動。在高特權消費的銀行,董事會多元性較低,但董事會專業性卻比較高。在高特權消費的銀行中,無相關業務經驗的董事較少,較少女性董事,董事平均年齡較老。在高特權消費銀行,普遍存在的大規模董事會,與高學歷、具學術背景的董事,這些都無法有效監督特權消費,唯有性別多元化的董事會才能有效監督特權消費。

(121_M577fb28c2b384_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(中文)

特權消費、CEO權力、績效、風險承擔、性別多元化董事會


摘要(英文)

This paper investigates why perks are high, how perks are related to bank performance, and which monitoring function works in the Chinese banking sector. Results show that stronger CEO power, CEOs with political ties, larger banks, and older banks are all associated with higher perks. Although we are unable to find a significant relationship between perks and entrenchment, banks with high perks underperform versus those with low perks. The relationship between perks and performance is more pronounced for banks that are prone to emphasize status, such as large banks and banks with high CEO power. Banks with high perks are also associated with high risk-taking and are more likely to be engaged in events that have a high variability of performance. Boards of directors in high-perk banks are less diversified, but surprisingly, more professional. Evidence also presents that fewer directors with unaffiliated business experience, fewer female directors, and older directors serve on the boards of high-perk banks. Large boards and directors with a higher education or academic background, which are common in high-perk banks, fail to efficiently monitor perks. Gender-diverse boards provide better monitoring.

(121_M577fb28c2b384_Abs.pdf(檔案不存在))

關鍵字(英文)

Perquisites, CEO Power, Performance, Risk-taking, Gender-diverse Boards


政策與管理意涵

Perks reflect wasteful corporate practices such as lax management and overinvestment. Banks with high perks underperform those with low perks in many ways, such as performance, risk-taking, and variability of performance. Perks hidden in accounting notes, not to mention banks whose annual reports are unavailable, are hard to observe by outsiders. Information disclosure on perk consumptions could be the first step to reduce inefficient perks. We suggest more regulations to enforce the disclosure of perk consumptions. Before this occurs, investors can take notice of large or old banks and banks with strong CEO power or with politically-connected CEOs, which are more likely to have high perk consumptions. Although perks are hard for outsiders to observe and monitor, investors can try and rely on diversified board members to provide effective monitoring. When director members are being recruited, as Leung (2015) suggests, a board should consider factors like age, race, gender, educational background and professional qualifications, which would make the board less homogenous.


參考文獻

Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., and Ferreira, D., 2005, “Powerful CEOs and Their Impact on
Corporate Performance,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1403-1432.
Adams, R. B. and Ferreira, D., 2009, “Women in the boardroom and their impact on
governance and performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 94, No. 2, 291-309.
Adithipyangkul, P., Alon, I., and Zhang, T. Y., 2011, “Executive perks: Compensation and corporate performance in China,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 28,
No. 2, 401-425.
Anderson, R. C. and Fraser, D. R., 2000, “Corporate Control, Bank Risk Taking, and the Health of the Banking Industry,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 24, No. 8, 1383-1398.
Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., and Ferrell, A., 2009, “What Matters in Corporate Governance?”
Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 22, No. 2, 783-827.
Berger, A. N., Hasan, I., and Zhou, M., 2009, “Bank Ownership and Efficiency in China:
What Will Happen in the World's Largest Nation?” Journal of Banking & Finance,
Vol. 33, No. 1, 113-130.
Berger, P. G., Ofek, E., and Yermack, D. L., 1997, “Managerial Entrenchment and Capital
Structure Decisions,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 4, 1411-1438.
Boyd, J. H., Graham, S. L., and Hewitt, R. S., 1993, “Bank holding company mergers with
nonbank financial firms: Effects on the risk of failure,” Journal of Banking &
Finance, Vol. 17, No. 1, 43-63.
Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., and Allen, F., 2011, Principles of Corporate Finance, 10th, New York: McGrow-Hill/Irwin.
Cai, H. B., Fang, H. M., and Xu, L. C., 2011, “Eat, Drink, Firms, Government: An Investigation of Corruption from the Entertainment and Travel Costs of Chinese
Firms,” Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 54, No. 1, 55-78.
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., and Simpson, W. G., 2003, “Corporate Governance, Board
Diversity, and Firm Value,” Financial Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, 33-53.
Chen, D., Li, O. Z., and Liang, S., 2010, “Do Managers Perform for Perks?” Working Paper,
Nanjing University.
Cheng, S., 2008, “Board Size and the Variability of Corporate Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 87, No. 1, 157-176.
Daily, C. M. and Johnson, J. L., 1997, “Sources of CEO Power and Firm Financial Performance: A Longitudinal Assessment,” Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, 97-117.
Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Huizinga, H. P., 1999, “Determinants of Commercial Bank Interest Margins and Profitability: Some International Evidence,” World Bank Economic
Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, 379-408.
Edgerton, J., 2012, “Agency Problems in Public Firms: Evidence from Corporate Jets in
Leveraged Buyouts,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 67, No. 6, 2187-2213.
Fama, E. F., 1980, “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88, No. 2, 288-307.
Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., and Zhang, T., 2007, “Politically Connected CEOs, Corporate
Governance, and Post-IPO Performance of China's Newly Partially Privatized Firms,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 84, No. 2, 330-357.
Finkelstein, S., 1992, “Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and
Validation,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, No. 3, 505-538.
Garcia-Herrero, A., Gavila, S., and Santabárbara, D., 2009, “What Explains the Low Profitability of Chinese Banks?” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 33, No. 11, 2080-2092.
Grossman, S. J. and Hart, O. D., 1980, “Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation,” The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 11, No. 1, 42-64.
Gul, F. A., Cheng, L. T. W., and Leung, T. Y., 2011, “Perks and the informativeness of stock prices in the Chinese market,” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 17, No. 5, 1410-1429.
Hirsch, F., 1976, Social Limits to Growth, 1st, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jensen, M. C., 1986, “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and
Takeovers,” American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, 323-329.
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H., 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3,
No. 4, 305-360.
Leung, E. Y., 2015, “Diversifying the Board- A Step towards Better Governance,”
http://www.accaglobal.com/ie/en/student/exam-support-resources/professionalexams-study-resources/p1/technical-articles/diversifying-the-board--a-step-towardsbetter-governance.html, accessed on January 20, 2016.
Luo, W., Zhang, Y., and Zhu, N., 2011, “Bank ownership and executive perquisites: New evidence from an emerging market,” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 17, No. 2, 352-370.
Malmendier, U. and Tate, G., 2008, “Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 89, No. 1, 20-43.
Marino, A. M. and Zábojník, J., 2008, “Work-related perks, agency problems, and optimal incentive contracts,” Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 39, No. 2, 565-585.
Micco, A., Panizza, U., and Yañez, M., 2007, “Bank Ownership and Performance. Does
Politics Matter?” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 31, No. 1, 219-241.
Newton, A. N., 2015, “Executive compensation, organizational performance, and
governance quality in the absence of owners,” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 30, February, 195-222.
Norburn, D. and Birley, S., 1988, “The top management team and corporate performance,”
Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3, 225-237.
Ocasio, W., 1994, “Political Dynamics and the Circulation of Power: CEO Succession in
U.S. Industrial Corporations, 1960-1990,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 2, 285-312.
Pathan, S., 2009, “Strong Boards, CEO Power and Bank Risk-Taking,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 33, No. 7, 1340-1350.
Rajan, R. G. and Wulf, J., 2006, “Are perks purely managerial excess?” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 79, No. 1, 1-33.
Salas, J. M., 2010, “Entrenchment, governance, and the stock price reaction to sudden executive deaths,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 34, No. 3, 656-666.
Xu, N. H., Li, X. R., Yuan, Q. B., and Chan, K. C., 2014, “Excess perks and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China,” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 25, April, 419-434.
Yermack, D., 2006, “Flights of fancy: Corporate jets, CEO perquisites, and inferior shareholder returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 80, No. 1, 211-242.